Name: Flock-Off contract tracker
Creator: Flock-Off
License: https://github.com/PaulinoTech1/Flock-Off
Keywords: Flock Safety, ALPR, license plate reader, public contracts, surveillance

Contract tracker

State

Status

Evidence

Sort

Export

Loading…

Agency	State	Status	Cameras	Annual cost	Renewal / decision
Acushnet	MA	Under debate	—	—	2026-09-02
Ayer	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-31
Barnstable	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	4	—	2026-09-03
Bellingham	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-28
Boylston	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-11
Dartmouth	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-29
East Bridgewater	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	1	—	2026-08-21
Easton	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-30
Groton	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-31
Hopkinton	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-20
Lowell	MA	Under debate	—	—	2026-09-23
Nantucket	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-16
New Bedford	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-10-23
Stoughton	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-04
Waltham	MA	Under debate	—	—	2026-09-10
Wellesley	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	1	—	2026-08-19
Wilmington	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	2	—	2026-09-15
Putnam	CT	Under debate	5	—	2025-10-20
Cumberland	RI	Under debate	—	—	—
Glocester	RI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	$5,000	2026-08-06
Narragansett	RI	Cancelled pending validation*	4	$12,600	2026-08-03
North Kingstown	RI	Cancelled pending validation*	6	—	—
Providence	RI	Under debate	25	—	—
	RI	Active	39	—	—
Bristol	RI	Under debate	—	—	2025-11-12
South Kingstown	RI	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2026-07-27
Tiverton	RI	Active	4	—	2026-07-29
Portsmouth	RI	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	—
Warren	RI	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	—
Manchester	NH	Active	0	—	—
Portsmouth	NH	Under debate	—	—	—
Manchester	VT	Active	5	$15,000	—
South Portland	ME	Cancelled pending validation*	7	—	2026-06-11
Beacon	NY	Active	—	—	—
Poughkeepsie	NY	Cancelled pending validation*	65	—	2026-09-25
Niagara Falls	NY	Active	24	—	—
Scarsdale	NY	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	2025-08-07
Syracuse	NY	Cancelled pending validation*	131	—	2026-02-09
Troy	NY	Active	26	$78,000	—
North Brunswick	NJ	Under debate	—	$35,000	2025-09-01
Abington	PA	Cancelled pending validation*	3	—	2026-08-27
Chambersburg	PA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-26
State College	PA	Expired pending validation*	—	—	2026-10-13
Philadelphia	PA	Active	—	—	—
Wilmington	DE	Cancelled pending validation*	4	—	2026-08-05
Washington	DC	Active	67	$336,000	2026-12-31
Augusta County	VA	Active	2	—	—
Bridgewater	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-08
Charlottesville	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2025-12-15
Lynchburg	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-03
Newport News	VA	Active	74	$222,000	—
Staunton	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	6	—	2025-12-19
Asheville	NC	Cancelled pending validation*	11	—	2026-08-25
Dare County	NC	Cancelled pending validation*	14	—	—
Greenville	NC	Proposal rejected pending validation*	10	—	2026-09-10
Henderson County	NC	Active	13	—	—
Hendersonville	NC	Active	—	$6,000	—
Nags Head	NC	Under debate	12	—	—
New Hanover County	NC	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-08
Rutherford County	NC	Under debate	—	—	—
Wrightsville Beach	NC	Active	4	—	—
Greenville County	SC	Active	32	—	—
Gwinnett County	GA	Active	—	—	—
Bradford County	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2026-08-31
Brevard County	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	7	—	2026-08-31
Oviedo	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2026-09-21
Jacksonville	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-31
Palm Bay	FL	Under debate	51	—	2026-09-21
Volusia County	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-31
Harrisonburg	VA	Cancelled verified	33	—	2026-07-28
Ithaca	NY	Cancelled verified	22	—	2026-03-04
Dayton	OH	Under debate	72	—	2026-05-01
Elyria	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	15	—	2026-08-28
Reynoldsburg	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-09
Pierce Township	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Oxford	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	14	—	—
Monroe	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-22
Akron	OH	Active	145	—	2022-06-10
Lorain	OH	Active	40	—	2023-02-08
Strongsville	OH	Active	19	$63,500	—
Cleveland	OH	Active	100	—	2026-07-15
Mansfield	OH	Active	24	—	—
Euclid	OH	Active	26	—	—
Columbus	OH	Under debate	—	—	—
Menominee	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-05-18
Ypsilanti	MI	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	2022-09-13
Bay City	MI	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	2025-11-17
	MI	Active	30	$75,000	2021-11-16
Troy	MI	Active	25	$66,000	—
	MI	Active	5	—	—
New Baltimore	MI	Active	9	—	—
	MI	Active	—	—	—
Grand Rapids	MI	Active	29	—	—
	MI	Active	62	—	—
	MI	Active	31	$45,000	—
Bloomington	IN	Cancelled pending validation*	6	—	2026-07-23
Bloomington	IN	Expired pending validation*	—	—	—
Fort Wayne	IN	Cancelled pending validation*	36	—	2026-08-25
	IN	Cancelled pending validation*	31	—	2026-09-10
Chesterton	IN	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-14
	IN	Under debate	—	—	—
Evansville	IN	Active	55	$142,500	—
Evansville	IN	Active	17	—	—
Indianapolis	IN	Active	275	—	2028-12-31
Plainfield	IN	Active	12	—	—
South Bend	IN	Active	52	—	—
Lafayette	IN	Active	20	—	—
West Lafayette	IN	Active	4	—	—
Lafayette	IN	Active	—	—	—
Franklin	IN	Active	—	—	—
Danville	IN	Active	—	—	—
Boonville	IN	Active	—	—	—
Greenfield	IN	Active	—	—	—
Huntington	IN	Active	—	$15,000	—
Oak Park	IL	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2025-08-05
Evanston	IL	Cancelled pending validation*	19	—	2025-08-26
Springfield	IL	Active	—	—	—
Decatur	IL	Active	100	—	—
Champaign	IL	Active	46	—	—
Vernon Hills	IL	Active	28	—	—
Huntley	IL	Active	17	—	2023-04-13
Quincy	IL	Active	20	—	—
Rantoul	IL	Active	25	—	—
Appleton	WI	Cancelled verified	20	—	2026-05-06
Madison	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	24	$80,000	2026-04-16
Racine	WI	Active	—	—	2026-09-15
Racine	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-04
Kenosha	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	31	—	2026-09-02
Sheboygan	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	15	—	2026-09-08
Oshkosh	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-04-22
Green Bay	WI	Active	42	—	2026-09-14
Milwaukee	WI	Active	31	—	2026-08-31
Fond du Lac	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-04
Memphis	TN	Active	—	—	—
Memphis	TN	Active	—	—	—
Germantown	TN	Active	—	—	—
Millington	TN	Active	19	$47,500	2024-01-08
Johnson City	TN	Active	145	—	2025-07-17
Murfreesboro	TN	Active	—	—	—
Knoxville	TN	Cancelled pending validation*	143	—	2026-08-31
Lexington	KY	Active	125	$317,500	2024-04-25
Elizabethtown	KY	Active	40	$100,000	2023-12-08
La Grange	KY	Active	—	—	—
Lexington	KY	Active	15	—	—
Jeffersontown	KY	Active	—	—	—
Morgantown	WV	Active	20	—	—
Fairmont	WV	Active	41	—	—
Birmingham	AL	Active	—	—	—
Huntsville	AL	Active	—	$6,000	—
Birmingham	AL	Active	—	—	—
Decatur	AL	Active	40	—	—
Ridgeland	MS	Active	20	—	2021-10-19
Scottsdale	AZ	Active	85	$370,000	2026-10-06
Tempe	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	33	—	2026-08-26
Chandler	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	40	$153,000	2026-08-07
Surprise	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	28	—	2026-08-13
Pinal County	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08
Sedona	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	11	—	2025-09-09
Flagstaff	AZ	Cancelled pending validation*	32	—	2025-12-16
Cottonwood	AZ	Under debate	—	—	2026-09-04
Tucson	AZ	Active	62	$160,000	2025-02
Queen Creek	AZ	Active	62	—	2026-09-02
Los Angeles	CA	Expired pending validation*	138	—	2026-07-11
Santa Cruz	CA	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2026-01-13
Mountain View	CA	Cancelled verified	30	—	2026-02-24
Grass Valley	CA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-11
San Jose	CA	Active	490	—	—
Fresno	CA	Active	80	$492,000	2024-02-22
Woodland	CA	Active	38	$148,000	2026-02-03
Stockton	CA	Active	120	—	2026-03-31
Oxnard	CA	Under debate	19	—	—
Berkeley	CA	Active	52	—	2026-03-24
Denver	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	110	—	2026-03-31
Aurora	CO	Active	—	—	—
Englewood	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	12	$64,500	2026-09-08
Fort Collins	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	15	—	2026-06-16
Steamboat Springs	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	6	—	2026-08-26
Steamboat Springs	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	6	$18,050	2026-09-02
Hayden	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	2	$6,000	2026-09-03
Thornton	CO	Active	16	$48,500	—
Castle Rock	CO	Cancelled pending validation*	50	—	2026-07-14
Fountain	CO	Active	—	—	—
Wichita	KS	Active	—	—	—
Gardner	KS	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-17
Wellsville	KS	Cancelled pending validation*	2	—	2026-08-20
Salina	KS	Active	24	—	2026-06-01
Derby	KS	Active	16	—	2021-10-26
Park City	KS	Active	—	—	—
Newton	KS	Active	4	—	—
Manhattan	KS	Active	11	$33,000	—
Kansas City	KS	Active	—	—	—
Baton Rouge	LA	Active	—	—	—
Baton Rouge	LA	Active	—	—	—
Gretna	LA	Active	—	—	—
Kenner	LA	Active	55	—	2022-12-01
Central	LA	Active	11	—	2022-04-12
Lafayette	LA	Active	—	—	—
Thibodaux	LA	Active	54	—	—
Houma	LA	Active	39	—	—
St. Charles	MO	Cancelled verified	—	—	2026-08-20
Waynesville	MO	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-19
Willard	MO	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-21
Bolivar	MO	Cancelled pending validation*	5	—	—
Jefferson City	MO	Active	17	$51,000	—
Columbia	MO	Active	—	—	2024-10-07
Louisiana	MO	Cancelled pending validation*	7	—	2026-09-28
Parkville	MO	Under debate	—	—	—
Springfield	MO	Active	—	$45,000	—
Brentwood	MO	Active	—	—	—
Oklahoma City	OK	Active	90	$270,000	2027-06-30
Tulsa	OK	Active	—	—	—
	OK	Active	25	—	—
Norman	OK	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	—
Bartlesville	OK	Active	—	—	—
Muskogee	OK	Active	—	—	—
Guthrie	OK	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Tahlequah	OK	Cancelled pending validation*	6	$21,900	2026-09-08
Coweta	OK	Cancelled pending validation*	2	—	—
	OK	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-07-21
Eugene	OR	Cancelled pending validation*	57	$171,000	2025-12-05
Springfield	OR	Cancelled pending validation*	25	$77,000	2025-12-05
Eugene	OR	Cancelled pending validation*	22	$66,000	2025-12-10
Albany	OR	Cancelled pending validation*	4	$14,000	2026-05-28
Woodburn	OR	Cancelled verified	23	$84,000	2026-06-23
Bend	OR	Expired pending validation*	4	—	2026-01
Florence	OR	Active	6	—	2026-02-02
Talent	OR	Under debate	—	—	2025-12-22
Dallas	TX	Active	684	—	2025-06-15
Fort Worth	TX	Active	250	—	—
San Antonio	TX	Active	35	—	—
College Station	TX	Active	84	—	2026-09-24
El Paso	TX	Cancelled pending validation*	150	—	2026-09-15
Austin	TX	Cancelled verified	—	—	2025-06-21
San Marcos	TX	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Manvel	TX	Cancelled pending validation*	16	—	2026-09-08
Pflugerville	TX	Cancelled pending validation*	28	—	2026-08-25
Willis	TX	Under debate	—	—	2026-09-08
Olympia	WA	Cancelled pending validation*	15	$45,000	2025-12-02
Everett	WA	Active	71	$250,000	2024-05
Chelan County	WA	Active	12	—	—
Redmond	WA	Cancelled pending validation*	24	—	2026-07-21
Lynnwood	WA	Cancelled pending validation*	25	—	2026-02-23
Mill Creek	WA	Active	—	—	—
Kent	WA	Active	25	$60,000	—
Renton	WA	Active	24	$88,240	2026-05-04
Spokane County	WA	Active	46	—	2026-04
Spokane	WA	Active	30	$91,000	—
Little Rock	AR	Active	—	$345,000	2025-10-21
Fort Smith	AR	Active	21	—	2026-08-27
Van Buren	AR	Active	—	—	2026-09-02
Beebe	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-24
Searcy	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Pea Ridge	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Greers Ferry	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Mayflower	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Cabot	AR	Under debate	—	—	—
Centerton	AR	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Waukee	IA	Cancelled pending validation*	11	—	2026-08-14
Indianola	IA	Cancelled pending validation*	8	$24,000	2026-08-17
Coralville	IA	Cancelled verified	4	$18,000	2026-02-24
Urbandale	IA	Active	26	$50,000	—
West Des Moines	IA	Active	57	—	—
Cedar Rapids	IA	Active	70	—	2026-06-30
Ankeny	IA	Active	16	$35,000	—
Altoona	IA	Active	51	—	—
Clive	IA	Active	20	—	—
Nevada	IA	Active	2	—	—
Caldwell	ID	Active	87	$378,000	—
Twin Falls	ID	Active	—	$43,800	—
Idaho Falls	ID	Active	—	—	—
Pocatello	ID	Active	—	—	—
Jerome	ID	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Hailey	ID	Active	16	—	2027-03-30
Bellevue	ID	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Wilder	ID	Active	—	—	—
Boise	ID	Active	—	—	—
Forest Heights	MD	Active	11	$16,500	—
Salisbury	MD	Active	—	—	—
Millersville	MD	Active	—	—	—
Boonsboro	MD	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-10
Columbia Heights	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	12	—	2026-06-08
Crystal	MN	Cancelled verified	6	—	2026-09-09
Duluth	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	9	—	2026-08-03
Saint Paul	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	2	—	2026-08-26
Plymouth	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	16	—	—
Brooklyn Park	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Winona	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	8	—	2026-08-12
North Branch	MN	Cancelled pending validation*	3	—	2026-09-09
Anoka	MN	Active	—	—	—
Shakopee	MN	Active	—	—	—
Kearney	NE	Active	28	—	2023-12-12
Papillion	NE	Active	30	$43,000	2023-07-18
Ord	NE	Cancelled pending validation*	2	—	2026-08-03
Ord	NE	Active	7	—	—
Grand Island	NE	Active	—	—	—
Scottsbluff	NE	Active	—	—	—
Alliance	NE	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	2026-08-25
Alma	NE	Active	—	—	—
Grand Island	NE	Active	—	—	—
Chadron	NE	Active	3	$7,500	—
Kearney	NE	Active	—	—	—
Omaha	NE	Active	15	—	—
Albuquerque	NM	Cancelled pending validation*	21	—	2026-09-03
Las Cruces	NM	Active	21	$141,850	—
Rio Rancho	NM	Active	19	—	—
Alamogordo	NM	Active	60	—	—
Farmington	NM	Active	24	—	—
Aztec	NM	Active	7	—	—
Las Cruces	NM	Active	7	—	—
Alamogordo	NM	Active	—	—	—
Reno	NV	Cancelled pending validation*	29	—	2026-10-08
Sparks	NV	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
	NV	Active	—	—	—
Las Vegas	NV	Active	180	—	—
Las Vegas	NV	Active	—	—	2026-08-24
Ogden	UT	Active	41	—	—
Provo	UT	Active	—	—	—
Highland	UT	Active	3	$9,000	—
Draper	UT	Active	—	—	—
Loa	UT	Active	—	—	2025-02-04
Cedar City	UT	Active	—	$157,500	—
North Ogden	UT	Active	—	—	—
Tooele	UT	Active	—	—	—
Humacao	PR	Active	12	—	—
Santa Isabel	PR	Active	12	—	—
San Lorenzo	PR	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	—
	VI	Under debate	—	—	—
Ithaca	NY	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-04-14
Marinette	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	4	—	2026-09-17
Eastpointe	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-17
Manitowoc	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-25
Clawson	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-23
Adrian	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-21
Bedford Township	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	4	$12,000	2026-09-10
Boynton Beach	FL	Cancelled pending validation*	—	$60,000	2026-09-16
Athens	OH	Active	6	—	2027
Reidsville	NC	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-14
Carey	ID	Proposal rejected pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-28
Tallahassee	FL	Under debate	150	—	2026-09-09
Cambridge	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	—
Cincinnati	OH	Cancelled pending validation*	75	—	2026-10-02
Newburgh	NY	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-29
South Lyon	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-29
Sturgis	MI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-29
Cookeville	TN	Active	10	$30,000	2026-09-17
Liberty Hill	TX	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-09
Arlington	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	41	—	2026-09-15
Henrico	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-10-06
Neenah	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	12	$30,000	2026-09-16
De Pere	WI	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-09-14
Richmond	VA	Cancelled pending validation*	99	—	2026-10-10
Milton	MA	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-10-06
South Windsor	CT	Cancelled pending validation*	—	—	2026-10-05

Every record is sourced and confidence-rated. Terminal claims (cancelled / rejected / expired) are marked verified only with 1+ primary record and 2+ independent news sources; the rest are marked pending validation*. What the badges mean · Evidence tiers. *Pending validation = does not yet meet the evidence bar; shown while awaiting corroboration. Spot an error or a missing contract? Open an issue.

How this tracker works

Evidence tiers

Cancelled, rejected, or expired claims are verified only with 1+ primary record (government/procurement document, court record, official statement, transparency portal) and 2+ independent news sources. Everything else is marked pending validation*, with its exact citation counts shown per record. News-only claims stay pending indefinitely, no matter how many outlets repeat the story. * Does not yet meet the evidence bar; shown while awaiting corroboration. Records not re-verified in 180 days drop to pending validation* automatically until re-confirmed. "Verified" here means "meets this evidence bar," not "absolute truth": read the underlying sources and decide for yourself.

Source transparency

– verified citations and – unverified leads across the dataset. Every citation is classified by an explicit, version-controlled domain list (scripts/classify_sources.py); unknown domains fail closed to unverified. Advocacy organizations, social and video platforms, aggregators, and AI summaries count as leads, never as citations.

Full domain classification (– domains)

Loading…

Open data

Dataset: agencies.json (last updated –) · classification: source_classification.json · methodology, scripts, and full history on GitHub.

Corrections and upkeep

Records are re-checked weekly (see the monitor runbook). Wrong or stale? Open an issue. Corrections win over pride.

Contracts

The actual contract documents behind the tracker, not articles about them. Signed agreements are the contracts themselves. Authorizing instruments are the resolutions, legislative items, and agenda approvals that create, renew, extend, or terminate a contract. Every entry is a document a reviewer read and classified; news stories and press statements about a contract do not qualify.

Accurate as of is the date the agency's tracker record was last checked against its sources. It is not the document's date, and it is not a guarantee the contract is still in force today; the status shown is the tracker record's status. Most agencies' signed contracts are not in our sources yet: of 353 records, only the documents below have been obtained so far. The rest are a public-records request away, and document tips are welcome.

Document type

Export

Loading…

Authorizing instrument

Flock Group Inc. Law Enforcement Agreement - Wichita PD

wichitaks.granicus.com · 2024-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Wichita, KS · Active

Order form between Flock Group Inc. and Wichita PD under a previously executed Law Enforcement Agreement, served from the city's Legistar download system. This copy is unexecuted: converted from .docx on October 4, 2024, its signature block contains blank DocuSign fields (\FSSignature1\, \FSFullname1\, \FSDateSigned1\) with no names, titles, or dates filled in. It is not the signed agreement; the executed agreement it references is not posted at this source.

Signed agreement

Flock Group Inc. Services Agreement Order Form - City of Park City KS

legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com · 2021-07-08 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Park City, KS · Active

Flock Group Inc. Services Agreement order form for Park City, KS, filed as a council attachment.

Signed agreement

Professional Services Agreement - Automated License Plate Readers (Council Letter 7492, FY24)

urbandale.civicweb.net · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Urbandale, IA · Active · Term: 2022-04-06 to open · Annual cost: $50,000 · Cameras: 26

Professional Services Agreement for automated license plate readers, filed with Urbandale Council Letter 7492 (FY24).

Signed agreement

Town of Forest Heights: Law Enforcement Agreement with Flock Safety (primary contract)

go.boarddocs.com · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Forest Heights, MD · Active · Annual cost: $16,500 · Cameras: 11

The Law Enforcement Agreement between Flock Safety and the Town of Forest Heights, filed in the town's BoardDocs.

Signed agreement

NM - Las Cruces PD FlockOS LPR/Live Video Law Enforcement Agreement (signed contract PDF)

haussamen.com · 2026-02-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Las Cruces, NM · Active · Annual cost: $141,850 · Cameras: 21

Signed FlockOS LPR / live-video Law Enforcement Agreement. Provenance: public-records release hosted on a journalist's site, not a government server, and the citation is not yet classified verified in the dataset.

Authorizing instrument

Township of North Brunswick Resolution 302-9.25 (authorizing proprietary Flock ALPR contract)

live-township-of-north-brunswick.pantheonsite.io · 2025-09-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

North Brunswick, NJ · Under debate · Annual cost: $35,000

Township Resolution 302-9.25 authorizing the proprietary Flock ALPR contract.

Authorizing instrument

ID 24-204: Approve the updated Agreement between the City of Fresno Police Department and Flock Safety

fresno.granicusideas.com · 2024-02-22 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Fresno, CA · Active · Annual cost: $492,000 · Cameras: 80

Council agenda item ID 24-204 approving the updated agreement between Fresno PD and Flock Safety.

Authorizing instrument

Resolution No. 2023-178 - Flock Group Inc. 60 Month Services Agreement extension

kearney.granicus.com · 2023-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Kearney, NE · Active · Term: 2022-06 to open · Cameras: 28

Resolution No. 2023-178 extending the Flock Group Inc. 60-month Services Agreement.

Authorizing instrument

Resolution 2023-231 - Flock Safety Agreement and MOU

sarpy.civicweb.net · 2023-07 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Papillion, NE · Active · Term: 2023-07-18 to open · Annual cost: $43,000 · Cameras: 30

Resolution 2023-231 adopting the Flock Safety agreement and MOU ($46,300; $43,000 annual renewal per the agenda item).

Authorizing instrument

Resolution authorizing two-year Flock software subscription renewal, $690,000

littlerock.gov · 2025-10-21 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Little Rock, AR · Active · Annual cost: $345,000

Board of Directors resolution authorizing the two-year Flock software subscription renewal ($690,000).

Authorizing instrument

City of Dallas Legislation: Flock Safety contract approval

cityofdallas.legistar.com · 2025-06-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Dallas, TX · Active · Term: 2025-06-15 to 2028-06-14 · Cameras: 684

City of Dallas legislative item approving the Flock Safety contract (term 2025-06-15 to 2028-06-14 in the tracker record).

Authorizing instrument

City of Lynnwood PD ALPR Program - Waiver Request & Contract Approval (official procurement document: 25 cameras, $171,153.50, 2-year)

legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com · 2024-10-30 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Lynnwood, WA · Cancelled · Term: 2025-01 to open · Cameras: 25

Official procurement document: waiver request and contract approval for the Lynnwood PD ALPR program (25 cameras, $171,153.50, 2 years, per the document).

Authorizing instrument

Resolution RES 26-005 terminating the Flock Safety contract (City of Harrisonburg)

meetings.cvilledata.org · 2026-07-28 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Harrisonburg, VA · Cancelled · Term: 2023-06-30 to 2026-07-31 · Cameras: 33

Resolution RES 26-005 terminating the Flock Safety contract (contract ran 2023-06-30 to 2026-07-31 in the tracker record).

Authorizing instrument

Resolution to end the city's relationship with Flock Safety (City of Ithaca, via Legistar)

legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com · 2026-03-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Ithaca, NY · Cancelled · Cameras: 22

Common Council resolution to end the City of Ithaca's relationship with Flock Safety, filed in Legistar.

Authorizing instrument

RESOLUTION NO. R2021-40 authorizing a lease agreement between the City of Decatur and Flock Safety for 60 LPR cameras (City of Decatur, adopted 2021-03-15)

alprwatch.org · 2021-03-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Decatur, IL · Active · Term: 2021-03 to open · Cameras: 100

Resolution R2021-40 authorizing the lease agreement for 60 LPR cameras. Provenance: public-records (MuckRock) release hosted by ALPR Watch; the citation is not yet classified verified in the dataset.

Authorizing instrument

Resolution 3-2024 (Millington, TN): approving contract with Flock Group Inc for Millington PD's Flock cameras

millingtontn.gov · 2024-01-08 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Millington, TN · Active · Annual cost: $47,500 · Cameras: 19

Resolution 3-2024 (adopted 2024-01-08) approving Millington PD's contract with Flock Group Inc: maintenance and support for 19 cameras at $47,500 per year for five years, with an option to renew for two more years. All figures are the resolution's own stated terms.

Authorizing instrument

City of Wichita agenda report re: Flock LPR devices (Item VI-7)

wichitaks.granicus.com · 2024-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Wichita, KS · Active

City Council Agenda Report VI-7 (October 15, 2024) recommending approval of the contracts with Flock Safety: 10 additional Falcon LPR devices under a five-year agreement at $151,500, and 21 additional Falcon readers under a two-year agreement at $186,150 for year one.

Authorizing instrument

Flock License Plate Reader Cameras - Consent Agenda Item, City Council

derby.civicweb.net · 2021-10-26 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Derby, KS · Active · Cameras: 16

City Council consent agenda item (October 26, 2021); the recommended motion reads: 'Approve the purchase of seven Flock cameras including installation for a two year period for $36,750.'

Authorizing instrument

Coralville City Council minutes, February 24, 2026 (Resolution 2026-16)

coralville.org · 2026-02-24 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Coralville, IA · Cancelled · Term: 2025-05-12 to open · Annual cost: $18,000 · Cameras: 4

City Council minutes (February 24, 2026) recording adoption of Resolution No. 2026-16, 'Resolution terminating the Agreement with Flock Group and rescinding Police Policy regarding Automated License Plate Readers' (vote 3-1, one absent).

Signed agreement

Flock Safety order form: CA - Fresno PD (36-month initial term)

agendas.fresno.gov · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Fresno, CA · Active · Annual cost: $492,000 · Cameras: 80

Executed order form (Exhibit A) with the Master Services Agreement between Flock Group, Inc. and the City of Fresno: 36-month initial term, annual recurring $492,000, contract total $1,498,690.41. The council item approving the updated agreement (ID 24-204) is also on this page.

Signed agreement

Flock Safety Order Form - WA Olympia PD (24-month, 15 Falcon cameras)

alprwatch.org · 2024-03 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Olympia, WA · Cancelled · Term: 2024-03 to open · Annual cost: $45,000 · Cameras: 15

Signed order form between Flock Group, Inc. and the City of Olympia (signed March 28-29, 2024): 15 Falcon cameras, 24-month initial term, contract total $90,000 billed at signing. Provenance: public-records release hosted by ALPR Watch (MuckRock), not a government server.

Authorizing instrument

RESOLUTION NO. R2023-231 authorizing a five-year lease agreement extension with Flock Safety (City of Decatur staff memo, 2023-10-27)

alprwatch.org · 2023-11-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Decatur, IL · Active · Term: 2021-03 to open · Cameras: 100

Resolution R2023-231 (adopted November 6, 2023) authorizing a five-year lease agreement extension with Flock Safety: 100 LPR cameras for 2024 through 2028, payments not to exceed $250,000 per year. Provenance: public-records (MuckRock) release hosted by ALPR Watch; text verified against the city's official agenda attachment.

Authorizing instrument

City Commission Agenda Summary: Flock Group Inc. dba Flock Safety, Flock Safety Platform: Safe City Project

johnsoncitytn.civicweb.net · 2025-07-17 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Johnson City, TN · Active · Term: 2025-07-17 to open · Cameras: 145

City Commission agenda summary packet (approved July 17, 2025) for a resolution authorizing a 10-year licensing and purchasing agreement with Flock Group Inc. dba Flock Safety: contract total $8,063,000, procured via OMNIA cooperative contract #RS250203. The packet includes the Flock Safety statement of work (draft revision 1.0).

Authorizing instrument

ALPR pilot program resolution | City of Austin

services.austintexas.gov · 2025 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Austin, TX · Cancelled · Term: 2024-03-28 to open

Council meeting backup text of the resolution authorizing continuation of the ALPR pilot program (File ID 25-0935, June 5, 2025 meeting). The document states the pilot under the 2023 Flock agreement ran March 28, 2024 to June 21, 2025 unless continued. Caveat: this copy's adoption block and resolution number are blank.

Authorizing instrument

Amended Motion for STM Article 15 - Police Department Capital (Stoughton)

stoughton.org · 2026-04-28 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Stoughton, MA · Cancelled

Select Board's amended motion for Special Town Meeting Article 15 (February 3, 2026) requesting that Stoughton PD cancel any existing or pending contracts with Flock Safety and return Flock equipment, and striking the $60,000 Flock Safety Software capital line. The motion document does not itself record the town meeting vote.

Authorizing instrument

Euclid Public Safety Committee agenda, Ord. (040-22)

cdn.euclidlibrary.org · 2022-04-20 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Euclid, OH · Active · Cameras: 26

Public Safety Committee agenda (April 20, 2022) printing Ordinance (040-22), authorizing the mayor to enter a two-year contract with Flock Safety, with an option for a two-year renewal, for LPR cameras and software, not to exceed $110,000.

Authorizing instrument

Ordinance No. 1401 — An ordinance to prohibit the installation or use of electronic license plate scanning devices in the City of Ypsilanti (adopted 2022-09-13)

cityofypsilanti.com · 2022-09-13 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Ypsilanti, MI · Proposal rejected

Ordinance No. 1401 (adopted September 13, 2022, effective October 13, 2022): 'The installation or use of electronic license plate scanning devices in the City of Ypsilanti is prohibited.' The ordinance bans the device class citywide; it does not name Flock Safety.

Authorizing instrument

Mayor Jacob A. Woodford memo: Flock Service Termination and Final Recommendation

legistar1.granicus.com · 2026-06-22 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Appleton, WI · Cancelled · Cameras: 20

Mayor's memorandum 'Flock Service Termination and Final Recommendation' (June 22, 2026): the City notified Flock Group, Inc. of its intention to end use of its products effective June 30, 2026, and the memo requests approval to issue no further payments under the terminated service. The document states Common Council approval is not required to terminate.

Authorizing instrument

Town of Forest Heights: Town Council Staff Report, GOCCP-funded Flock ALPR expansion (primary)

go.boarddocs.com · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Forest Heights, MD · Active · Annual cost: $16,500 · Cameras: 11

Town Council staff report recommending approval of an expansion of the Flock ALPR system funded through the Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention ($40,000 grant): current cost $30,000 annually for 11 fixed sites, 7 additional sites at $16,500. The signed Forest Heights agreement is also on this page.

Authorizing instrument

City of Columbia Heights council attachment: Flock contract termination details (7 fixed + 5 flex cameras, $49,000 final-year payout)

mccmeetingspublic.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net · 2026-06-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Columbia Heights, MN · Cancelled · Cameras: 12

City Council agenda item (council letter, June 4, 2026): 'Service and Contract Cancellation with Flock Safety.' The item recounts the two contracts executed in May 2024 (7 fixed cameras and 5 flex cameras, 12-month initial terms, three-year totals $89,500 and $61,500) and carries the recommended motion to approve termination of all Flock Safety services and contracts.

Authorizing instrument

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council minutes, June 27, 2024 (Resolution 0621-24: agreement with Flock Group Inc.)

lfucg.granicus.com · 2024-06-27 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Lexington, KY · Active · Annual cost: $317,500 · Cameras: 125

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council minutes, June 27, 2024: the Flock item appears as a docket description of an agreement with Flock Group Inc. covering 25 cameras and $453,375 for FY 2025. These minutes do not print a resolution number for the item and do not record a July 2, 2024 adoption.

Authorizing instrument

Cleveland City Council summary for Ordinance No. 683-2026 (Flock Safety ALPR licenses and maintenance, as amended)

cityofcleveland.legistar1.com · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Cleveland, OH · Active · Cameras: 100

The council summary authorizes the Director of Public Safety to enter into contracts with Flock Group, Inc. for acquisition or renewal of the annual license and maintenance of the Flock Safety ALPR solution for the Division of Police, for a period of six months as amended; the summary states $125,000, funded by the Division of Police operating budget, and that the Division has used the solution since 2023. The summary prints no date; the ordinance number is 683-2026.

Authorizing instrument

West Des Moines City Council minutes, April 3, 2023 (consent item 4(f): Additional Services Agreement, Flock Group, Inc.)

wdm.iowa.gov · 2023-04-03 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

West Des Moines, IA · Active · Term: 2020-06-23 to open · Cameras: 57

The April 3, 2023 council minutes record consent item 4(f), 'Approval of Additional Services Agreement - Flock Group, Inc.', approved with the consent agenda. The minutes print no camera count or dollar figure for the item.

Authorizing instrument

Scottsdale City Council marked agenda, October 6, 2026 (Item 16: Flock Camera Usage)

ww2.scottsdaleaz.gov · 2026-10-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Scottsdale, AZ · Active · Term: 2023-06-21 to 2028-06 · Annual cost: $370,000 · Cameras: 85

Item 16 took up continued use of Flock technology by the Scottsdale Police Department. On a 7/0 vote the council directed staff to review the current Flock Safety contract and report on exit steps, stating: 'It is the City Council's intent not to fund the Flock Safety contract for Fiscal Year 2027-2028,' with the City Manager directed to leave the funding out of that budget and staff to identify the steps 'needed to end the contract by June 30, 2027.'

Signed agreement

Insight Public Sector Quotation 0228029725, City of Alamogordo (signed December 27, 2024; Flock purchase via OMNIA Partners)

deflockalamo.org · 2024-12-16 · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Alamogordo, NM · Active · Cameras: 60

Signed quotation for the City of Alamogordo's Flock purchase through Insight Public Sector under OMNIA Partners (Cobb County) contract #23-6692-03, released under New Mexico IPRA. Document date December 16, 2024; signed December 27, 2024 by the Acting City Manager and Insight's Global Compliance Officer. Term length 24 months; Year 1 $246,150 and Year 2 $215,850 plus tax, total contract commit $462,000 plus tax. Line items print coverage dates from December 27, 2024 to December 26, 2026.

Authorizing instrument

Amendment No. 1 to Master Services Agreement, Flock Group Inc. and the City of Oklahoma City (approved August 18, 2026)

okc.gov · 2026-08-18 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Oklahoma City, OK · Active · Term: ? to 2027-06-30 · Renewal: 2027-06-30 · Annual cost: $270,000 · Cameras: 90

Amendment No. 1 to the Master Services Agreement between Flock Group Inc. and the City of Oklahoma City (original agreement entered June 5, 2023, Item No. IX.CV). It adds Section 4.4, restricting disclosure of agency data to federal agencies except under compulsory legal process. The city-hosted copy bears the council approval line dated August 18, 2026; its signature blocks are blank.

Authorizing instrument

College Station City Council agenda item, September 24, 2026 (attached Flock Safety agreement terms, TxDOT)

collegestationtx.api.civicclerk.com · 2026-09-24 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

College Station, TX · Active · Cameras: 84

The council item attaches the Flock Safety Hardware and Software Agreement terms between the City of College Station and Flock Group, Inc. Per the city's meeting recap, the council approved the agreement on September 24, 2026 (4-2): not to exceed $158,000 for cameras on TxDOT roads and $141,062 for cameras on non-TxDOT roads. The attached terms print no date and their exhibits are blank.

Signed agreement

Task Order Agreement No. CW123005, MPD LPR SaaS Solution (DC Office of Contracting and Procurement)

contracts.ocp.dc.gov · 2024-12-31 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Washington, DC · Active · Term: ? to 2026-12-31 · Renewal: 2026-12-31 · Annual cost: $336,000 · Cameras: 67

Task order issued by the DC Office of Contracting and Procurement to Insight Public Sector for a Flock Safety LPR SaaS solution for the Metropolitan Police Department: 67 locations; implementation $135,046.54 and Falcon infrastructure $201,000, total award $336,046.54. Signed by the contractor December 30, 2024 and the District contracting officer December 31, 2024.

Authorizing instrument

Everett City Council agenda item, May 29, 2024 (Community Public Safety Cameras: Flock Master Services Agreement and order form)

everettwa.gov · 2024-05-29 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Everett, WA · Active · Annual cost: $250,000 · Cameras: 71

Consent item recommending the council authorize the Mayor to sign the Master Services Agreement with Flock Group Inc.; contract costs not to exceed $250,000 per year, grant funded, for approximately 74 LPR cameras plus one PTZ camera in each of three parks. The attached order form (as presented, unexecuted) lists 71 Falcon, 2 Falcon Flex, 1 Falcon LR, and 3 Condor PTZ; Year 1 $253,900, annual recurring $234,000.

Authorizing instrument

Cedar Rapids City Council packet, June 25, 2024 (Resolution 0823-06-24: contract with Flock Group Inc.)

cms8.revize.com · 2024-06-25 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Cedar Rapids, IA · Active · Term: 2024-07-01 to 2026-06-30 · Cameras: 70

The packet's Resolution 0823-06-24 authorizes execution of a contract with Flock Group Inc. for the Police Department's ALPR system: two years, total not to exceed $499,250. The staff report states a contract has been prepared for the period July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026, with two two-year renewal options; whether any renewal option has been exercised is not documented in the packet.

Authorizing instrument

Flock Safety order form, City of Newport News (Law Enforcement Agreement; DocumentCloud public-records copy)

documentcloud.org · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-09-25

Newport News, VA · Active · Annual cost: $222,000 · Cameras: 74

Order form between Flock Group Inc. and the City of Newport News under the Law Enforcement Agreement, from a public-records release on DocumentCloud: 15 Falcon cameras; Year 1 $47,250, annual recurring $37,500, contract total $122,250; initial term 36 months, renewal term 24 months. The copy is unexecuted (signature blocks are blank placeholders) and prints no date. It covers 15 cameras; the record's larger deployment is documented in its other sources.

Authorizing instrument

Board of Trustees meeting packet, December 7, 2021 (Flock Safety agreement approval)

cms9files.revize.com · 2021-12-07 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

MI · Active · Annual cost: $75,000 · Cameras: 30

Township board meeting packet for December 7, 2021: the Board approved the agreement with Flock Safety for the License Plate Recognition project and a $75,000 budget amendment to fund it (roll call vote, motion carried). The packet prints no camera count or contract term.

Authorizing instrument

City Manager Administrative Order 2026-01: Use of Automated License Plate Readers and Related Surveillance Technology

grandrapidsmi.gov · 2026-09-03 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Grand Rapids, MI · Active · Cameras: 29

City Manager Administrative Order 2026-01 (September 3, 2026) governing ALPR use: it records that the City Commission approved GRPD's transition to Flock Safety through the Bid List Resolution dated January 23, 2024, that installation completed in June 2024, and that the current contract term expires June 9, 2027; the order authorizes continued use of the existing Flock units through that expiration. It prints no amounts or camera count.

Authorizing instrument

Village Board agenda packet, June 20, 2023 (Ordinance 2023-065, Flock Safety payment authorization)

vernonhills.org · 2023-06-20 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Vernon Hills, IL · Active · Cameras: 28

Village Board agenda packet for June 20, 2023, containing Ordinance 2023-065 (omnibus item): authorizes payment to Flock Safety not to exceed $56,950 for seventeen additional ALPR cameras, funded by an Illinois Attorney General Organized Retail Crime Grant. The ordinance is an expansion authorization; the record's total includes cameras authorized earlier.

Authorizing instrument

City Council support packet, March 12, 2025 (draft minutes of February 26, 2025: license plate reader project award)

cms3.revize.com · 2025-02-26 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-17

Niagara Falls, NY · Active · Cameras: 24

Council support packet for March 12, 2025 embedding the draft minutes of February 26, 2025: Item 5 approved the award of contracts for a license plate reader project for the Niagara Falls Police Department and authorized the Mayor to execute the necessary documents, per the Mayor's recommendation memo dated February 19, 2025 (roll call 5-0, adopted). The minutes print no vendor name, camera count, or amounts, and are marked draft.

Signed agreement

DocuSign Envelope ID AC67427B-D6B8-4536-AC7B-C32EE200C444: Flock Safety + KY - Elizabethtown PD (signed order form and MSA)

portal.ksba.org · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

Elizabethtown, KY · Active · Annual cost: $100,000 · Cameras: 40

Executed Flock Group, Inc. Master Services Agreement and order form (DocuSign Envelope ID AC67427B-D6B8-4536-AC7B-C32EE200C444, dated December 8, 2023): 40 Falcon cameras; Flock Safety Platform $100,000 per year recurring; Year 1 subtotal $114,400; contract total $514,400; initial term 60 months, renewal term 24 months. The term commences on first installation and validation, so no start or end date is printed. Signed for Flock by Mark Smith, General Counsel, and for the customer by Jeremy Thompson, Chief of Police, both dated 12/8/2023.

Signed agreement

Board of Control agenda packet with Flock Group Inc. order form and Government Agency Agreement (Ordinance 24-23)

public.destinyhosted.com · 2023-02-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

Lorain, OH · Active · Cameras: 40

Lorain Board of Control agenda packet, February 15, 2023, embedding the Flock Group Inc. order form and Government Agency Agreement: the item requests permission to enter a service agreement with Flock Group Inc. in the amount of $531,500, states Ordinance 24-23 passed City Council, and payment is from ARPA funds. Order form: 40 Falcon cameras at $2,500, total contract amount $531,500, annual recurring total $103,500, initial term 60 months, first four years paid upfront. Flock's signature (Mark Smith, General Counsel, February 1, 2023) appears in the packet copy; the agency signature block is blank in this copy.

Signed agreement

City Council Finance Meeting packet: Flock Group Inc. order form and Government Agency Customer Agreement (executed July 22, 2021)

troyny.gov · 2026-03-19 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

Troy, NY · Active · Term: 2021-08-16 to open · Annual cost: $78,000 · Cameras: 26

Flock Group Inc. order form and Government Agency Customer Agreement for the Troy City Police Department, carried in the City Council Finance Meeting packet of March 19, 2026 and executed by both parties on July 22, 2021 (PandaDoc certificate in the document): 11 Falcon cameras, Year 1 total $30,250, initial term 24 months, renewal term 24 months. Special terms state: Contract Starts on Mon 8/16 2021 after 60 Day Pilot finishes. The record's contract_start does not appear in the document; flagged for review, not changed.

Authorizing instrument

Annotated Agenda, Berkeley City Council Special Meeting (Flock Safety ALPR item; Resolution No. 72,254-N.S.)

berkeleyca.gov · 2026-05-07 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

Berkeley, CA · Active · Cameras: 52

Annotated agenda of the Berkeley City Council special meeting, May 7, 2026: on the Flock Safety item (continued from March 24, 2026; 156 speakers), the council voted not to move forward with the full Master Services Agreement execution as proposed, and adopted Resolution No. 72,254-N.S. authorizing extension of the current ALPR contract for 12 months for an additional contract amount up to $200,000 (motion Blackaby/Humbert, carried 5-4). No camera count is printed. The record's pending status predates this action; flagged for review, not changed.

Authorizing instrument

Board of Public Works approval letter and revocable encroachment permit: Flock Safety ALPR cameras (W. LaSalle Ave. & N. Lafayette Blvd.; Bonfield Pl. & S. Sheridan St.)

docs.southbendin.gov · 2024-10-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

South Bend, IN · Active · Term: 2021 to open · Cameras: 52

City of South Bend Board of Public Works letter dated October 10, 2024 (Theresa Heffner, Clerk), recording that at its October 10, 2024 meeting the Board approved Flock Safety's installation of two ALPR cameras in the public right-of-way on behalf of the South Bend Police Department at W. LaSalle Ave. & N. Lafayette Blvd. and Bonfield Pl. & S. Sheridan St.; the signed revocable encroachment permit (dated October 8, 2024) is enclosed in the same document.

Authorizing instrument

Minutes, Mayor and Board of Aldermen (consent item 2(i): Flock Safety Additional Services Agreement, Exhibit J)

ridgelandms.api.civicclerk.com · 2021-10-19 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-18

Ridgeland, MS · Active · Cameras: 20

Minutes of the Ridgeland Mayor and Board of Aldermen, October 19, 2021: the consent agenda, moved by Alderman D.I. Smith and seconded by Alderman Wesley Hamlin, carried 7-0, including item 2(i) approving the Flock Safety Additional Services Agreement for the Ridgeland Police Department (order attached as Exhibit J). Minutes signed by Mayor Gene F. McGee on October 26, 2021, attested by City Clerk Paula Tierce. The agreement itself (Exhibit J to the meeting packet) is not reproduced in the minutes.

Authorizing instrument

Ordinance 2024-008 (Master Services Agreement with Flock Group, Inc.)

strongsville.org · 2024-01-16 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Strongsville, OH · Active · Annual cost: $63,500 · Cameras: 19

Ordinance 2024-008 (adopted 2024-01-16, 7-0) authorizes a Master Services Agreement with Flock Group, Inc.; attached order form: 15 Falcon, 1 Falcon Flex, 3 Falcon LR; Year 1 $72,250; annual recurring $63,500; total $135,750; terms 24/24 months; mayor signed 2024-01-16; Flock signature block blank in packet copy; order form prints no start or end dates.

Authorizing instrument

Ordinance 2025-127 (six additional Flock LPR cameras)

strongsville.org · 2025-11-03 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Strongsville, OH · Active · Annual cost: $63,500 · Cameras: 19

Ordinance 2025-127 (adopted 2025-11-03, 7-0) authorizes six additional Flock LPR cameras; Year 1 $18,900; annual recurring $18,000; total $54,900; terms 36/36 months; mayor signed 2025-11-03; Flock signature block blank in packet copy; order form prints no start or end dates.

Authorizing instrument

City of Central council resolution authorizing a Flock Group agreement (copy hosted by Louisiana First News)

digital-release.louisianafirstnews.com · 2022-04-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Central, LA · Active · Cameras: 11

Council resolution authorizing Mayor Barrow to execute a multiyear agreement with Flock Group, Inc. for security cameras and license plate readers at city entrances; adopted 2022-04-12 per the certification paragraph; resolution number and vote tally blank in this copy; no figures or term dates printed.

Authorizing instrument

Mayor and Board of Selectmen's Meeting Minutes, October 20, 2025 (Town of Putnam)

resources.finalsite.net · 2025-10-20 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Putnam, CT · Under debate · Cameras: 5

October 20, 2025 board minutes record unanimous votes to add license plate readers to the agenda and to place bags over the readers on Town property pending discussion with the SSD Board; Selectman Hayes disputed the mayor's authority to approve use of Town land. The minutes do not name the Flock brand.

Signed agreement

Contract for Products and Services, City of Champaign / Flock Group, Inc. (License Plate Reader and Gunshot Detection Installation; public-records copy)

stopflock.org · 2022-03-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Champaign, IL · Active · Cameras: 46

Executed contract between the City of Champaign and Flock Group, Inc. (public-records copy): 46 Flock Falcon cameras plus Raven gunshot-detection coverage of 1.3 square miles; contract amount $240,500 (Year 1 $125,500, Year 2 $115,000); printed term: 24 months starting February 28, 2022. Signed by the Acting City Manager on March 15, 2022. The record's current deployment rests on a later renewal that is not yet in the registry.

Signed agreement

Flock Safety Law Enforcement Agreement and order form, Green Bay PD (drone first responder; DocuSigned)

deflockdane.org · 2025-12-23 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Green Bay, WI · Active · Cameras: 42

Executed Flock Safety Law Enforcement Agreement and order form for Green Bay PD's drone-as-first-responder program (DocuSign, signed December 22-23, 2025): 42 Flock Safety LPR cameras, 2 DFR dock systems, radar and Flock911; Year 1 $270,000, years 4-5 $291,000 per year, contract total $1,392,000; initial term 60 months, renewal term 36 months. The term commences on first installation and validation, so no start or end date is printed. Copy hosted by a public-records reading room.

Authorizing instrument

City of San Jose staff report, Council File 26-215 (ALPR program)

legistar.granicus.com · 2026-03-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

San Jose, CA · Active · Cameras: 490

City of San Jose staff report for Council File 26-215, approved March 10, 2026. The report states the city currently deploys 490 ALPR cameras: 190 funded in the General Fund at an annual ongoing cost of $580,000, and 300 funded by a 2023-2024 state grant at approximately $900,000 per year, with that grant expiring in December 2026. It recommends changing the ALPR data retention default from one year to 30 days. The record's camera count is corrected to the report's 490; an earlier figure of 516 is not supported by this document. The report is a policy document, not the contract; the underlying agreement was not located in the city's public postings.

Signed agreement

Government Agency Agreement and Order Form, City of Clive / Flock Group Inc. (public-records copy)

drive.google.com · 2022-12-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Clive, IA · Active · Term: 2022-12-12 to open · Cameras: 20

Executed Government Agency Agreement and Order Form between Flock Group Inc. and the City of Clive, signed by Mayor John Edwards on December 8, 2022 and by Flock's Mark Smith on December 12, 2022 (DocuSign envelope 94666EF9-249A-4DE1-9BDD-F2782FD6FF55); Resolution 2022-284 approving the agreement is bound in the same copy. Recurring total $52,500 per year; no camera count is printed. The initial 12-month term expired on its face in December 2023; section 6.1 provides automatic renewal for successive terms of at least one year unless either party gives 30 days' notice of non-renewal, and no non-renewal notice is in evidence. Copy obtained through the ACLU of Iowa's public-records reporting and hosted on Google Drive.

Authorizing instrument

Alpine City Council meeting packet, September 23, 2026 (Utah Public Notice Website)

utah.gov · 2026-09-23 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Highland, UT · Active · Annual cost: $9,000 · Cameras: 3

Alpine City Council meeting packet, September 23, 2026. The packet records that the Flock Safety agreement was approved on January 24, 2023 for six cameras at not more than $15,000 per year, that the three-year term expired and the agreement renewed automatically in April 2026 for an additional three-year term, and that on September 23, 2026 the council voted 4-1 to continue the Flock cameras at a reduced count of three cameras and an annual fee of $9,000. Lone Peak Police Department is the City of Alpine's police department. The packet is the renewal record; the agreement itself is not reproduced in it.

Authorizing instrument

Resolution and Flock order form, City of Huntsville (Legistar item 24-697 attachment)

legistar.granicus.com · 2024-09-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Huntsville, AL · Active · Annual cost: $6,000

City of Huntsville council packet attachment: resolution adopted September 12, 2024 authorizing the Mayor to enter a Professional Services Agreement with Flock Group Inc. (the resolution number is blank on this copy; 24-697 is the Legistar item number), with the Flock order form for AL - Huntsville PD. The order form lists 2 Flock Safety Falcon cameras as included, Year 1 subtotal $7,300, annual recurring subtotal $6,000, contract total $13,300; initial term 24 months, renewal term 24 months, automatic renewal unless either party gives 30 days' notice of non-renewal. Flock signed August 28, 2024; the Mayor's name is handwritten on the customer block. The 24-month initial term expired on its face in September 2026; continued operation rests on the printed automatic-renewal clause. The order form covers the units it lists and does not state a citywide camera total.

Authorizing instrument

Blaine County Sheriff's Office press release: BCSO to Remove Flock ALPR inside Carey City Limits

blainecountyid.gov · 2026-09-21 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Hailey, ID · Active · Term: ? to 2027-03-30 · Cameras: 16

Blaine County Sheriff's Office press release, September 21, 2026. The release states the Flock contract was signed in September 2024, officially began in March 2025 and expires in March 2027, costs approximately $60,000 per year, and covers 16 ALPR cameras across Blaine County; it announces the office will provide written notice that the contract will not auto-renew when it expires in March 2027, and that the cameras inside Carey city limits are being removed. This is the Sheriff's Office's official statement, not the contract.

Authorizing instrument

Tippecanoe County Board of Commissioners minutes, February 6, 2023

tippecanoe.in.gov · 2023-02-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Lafayette, IN · Active

Tippecanoe County Board of Commissioners minutes, February 6, 2023: Sheriff Bob Goldsmith presented an agreement with Flock Safety and additional terms and conditions, and the commissioners voted to approve the Sheriff's signature on the contract as presented. The minutes print no term, amount, or camera count; the agreement itself was presented at the meeting and is not reproduced in the minutes.

Signed agreement

Contract 2025-0325, Insight Public Sector / City of Springfield (Flock ALPR; OMNIA Partners 23-6692-03)

flockoutsgf.com · 2025-05-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Springfield, MO · Active · Annual cost: $45,000

Executed Contract 2025-0325 between Insight Public Sector, Inc. and the City of Springfield, Missouri, under OMNIA Partners contract 23-6692-03, signed May 12, 2025; Flock Group Inc. is the ALPR provider under the contract. The contract lists 15 Flock Falcon cameras at $3,000 each, $45,000 per year, a 60-month term commencing on first installation and validation of the hardware, and a total commitment of $225,000. The city's transparency portal reports 41 cameras across the wider deployment; this contract covers the 15 it lists. Copy hosted by flockoutsgf.com.

Authorizing instrument

City of Murfreesboro council minutes, July 31, 2025 (carried in the August 14, 2025 workshop packet)

murfreesborotn.gov · 2025-07-31 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Murfreesboro, TN · Active · Term: 2025-08-01 to open

City of Murfreesboro council minutes, July 31, 2025: consent item 5, 'Contract with Flock Group for LPR Cameras and Services (Police),' was approved 7-0 as part of the consent agenda. The minutes print no term, amount, or camera count; the contract itself is not reproduced in them.

Authorizing instrument

Thornton Police Department Flock Safety Q&A (published August 19, 2026)

thorntonpd.org · 2026-08-19 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Thornton, CO · Active · Annual cost: $48,500 · Cameras: 16

Thornton Police Department Flock Q&A, published August 19, 2026: 'Thornton Police Department pays approximately $51,000 per year for the Flock system.' A city council presentation in the record's sources states the original Flock contract was set to expire June 3, 2026, that the annual renewal was budgeted in the department's 2026 operational budget, and lists 16 cameras (10 stationary from 2022, 5 added in 2024, 1 portable) at $48,500 per year. No executed renewal instrument was located; this is the department's official statement, not a contract.

Authorizing instrument

City of Milwaukee waiver recap, Contract #E0000021123 (Council File #251653 attachment)

milwaukee.legistar1.com · 2026-02-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Milwaukee, WI · Active · Term: 2025-01-27 to 2027-01-26 · Cameras: 31

City of Milwaukee waiver-of-committee-approval recap for Contract #E0000021123 (Council File #251653), signed by the City Purchasing Director on December 9, 2025 and presented February 4, 2026. The recap states the Flock Group vendor service contract for the Milwaukee Police Department ran January 27, 2025 through January 26, 2026 at $52,500; Amendment #1 extended the term through January 26, 2027 and added 6 cameras (total $89,400); Amendment #2 added 3 cameras (total $100,400); Amendment #3 is shown as pending and would add $82,500, for a total of $182,900 including the pending amendment. The recap states the funds renew licenses for 31 City-funded Flock cameras for January 27, 2026 through January 26, 2027. The $182,900 figure includes the pending amendment and is not the approved total. This is the city's recap chart, not the agreement itself.

Authorizing instrument

City of Idaho Falls council packet, September 10, 2026 (adopted minutes of July 30, 2026)

idahofallsidaho.gov · 2026-09-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Idaho Falls, ID · Active

City of Idaho Falls council minutes adopted September 10, 2026, approving by a 6-0 vote an amendment to the city's two Flock Safety contracts with Flock Group, Inc. (entered February 28, 2025 and July 29, 2025). The amendment prohibits Flock from using city customer data, including photographs, to train its artificial intelligence program. The minutes and staff memo print no term dates, amounts, or camera counts, and the underlying contracts are not reproduced.

Signed agreement

Flock Group Inc. Services Agreement and Order Form, WA - Kent PD (City of Kent Laserfiche, CAG2022-366)

documents.kentwa.gov · 2022-09-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Kent, WA · Active · Annual cost: $60,000 · Cameras: 25

Flock Group Inc. Services Agreement and Order Form for WA - Kent PD, executed by Flock (Mark Smith, General Counsel, August 31, 2022) and by Mayor Dana Ralph on September 6, 2022 (DocuSign envelope AEF5DEC8-A700-41B9-BE33-A29300434F4E), served from the City of Kent's Laserfiche portal (document CAG2022-366). The order form lists 20 Falcon cameras, 5 Wing LPR units, Wing Replay, Advanced Search and implementation fees: Year 1 total $67,000, recurring total $60,000. Initial term 12 months with a 12-month renewal term; section 6.1 provides automatic renewal unless either party gives 30 days' notice of non-renewal. No calendar start or end date is printed.

Authorizing instrument

Cedar City Council adopted minutes, July 22, 2026 (carried in the August 12, 2026 council packet)

cedarcityut.gov · 2026-07-22 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Cedar City, UT · Active · Annual cost: $157,500

Cedar City Council adopted minutes, July 22, 2026: the council approved a contract renewal with Flock Safety at $157,500.01 per year as printed in the agenda item ($157,500 in the discussion) by a 5-0 vote, on a two-year cycle that returns to the council for future renewals, with a stated right to terminate on 30 days' written notice. The minutes print no calendar term dates and no camera count; the underlying contract was not in the public packet.

Signed agreement

Flock Safety order form, Hendersonville NC - PD (city-hosted copy)

hendersonvillenc.gov · 2024-08-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Hendersonville, NC · Active · Annual cost: $6,000

Executed Flock Safety order form for NC - Hendersonville PD, hosted on the city's website. Professional Services Standard Implementation Fee $650 x 2 = $1,300; Year 1 subtotal $7,300, annual recurring subtotal $6,000, contract total $13,300. Falcon cameras are priced as included and this order form does not print a camera quantity; the record's camera count comes from other sources. Signed for the customer by Chief Blair Myhand on August 1, 2024; the Flock signature date is blank in this copy. Initial term 12 months with automatic renewal for successive 12-month periods.

Signed agreement

Flock Safety Law Enforcement Agency Agreement and order form, Twin Falls PD (City DocumentCenter)

tfid.org · 2025 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Twin Falls, ID · Active · Annual cost: $43,800

Executed Flock Group Inc. Law Enforcement Agency Agreement and order form for the Twin Falls Police Department, posted in the city's DocumentCenter as the Flock 2025 Agreement. Subtotal Year 1 $43,800 and Annual Recurring Subtotal $43,800. The agreement renews automatically for successive renewal terms unless either party gives 30 days' notice of non-renewal. Signed by Flock Group Inc.; the customer signature date line is blank in this copy. A LiveView Agreement is incorporated by reference.

Authorizing instrument

City of Columbia annual surveillance report, ALPR section (Legistar attachment)

gocolumbiamo.legistar1.com · 2025 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Columbia, MO · Active

City of Columbia annual surveillance report: the ALPR program was first approved by the council in 2019 (Ordinance 025793), ALPR data is purged after 30 days unless flagged, and the city's current contract with Flock Safety expires in March 2027. This is the city's published surveillance reporting, not the contract; the agreement itself was not located in the city's postings.

Authorizing instrument

Draft Addendum No. 1 to the Flock Safety Agreement, City of Wilder council packet attachment, June 30, 2026

towncloud-core-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com · 2026-06-30 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Wilder, ID · Active

Council packet attachment: Draft Addendum No. 1 to the Flock Safety Agreement between Flock Group Inc. and the City of Wilder. The addendum changes the notice address, replaces the service exhibits and data terms (Exhibit C: 30-day retention, deletion of customer data on termination, no AI/ML training use, breach notice within 72 hours) and adds Idaho consumer-privacy terms. The packet copy is the draft attachment with Flock's edits; the city's adopted minutes record the council accepting the addendum on July 14, 2026, by 4-0 votes to approve and to adopt it. The underlying agreement, effective September 22, 2025, is not reproduced in the packet.

Authorizing instrument

Village of Huntley Board of Trustees adopted minutes, April 13, 2023

cms6.revize.com · 2023-04-13 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Huntley, IL · Active · Cameras: 17

Village of Huntley Board of Trustees adopted minutes, April 13, 2023: a motion to approve a Flock Safety agreement carried 6-0. The minutes describe a four-year term (48 months, $187,150) and 17 license plate reader cameras. The minutes are the authorizing record; the agreement itself is not reproduced in them.

Authorizing instrument

University of Kentucky vendor price-contract register (Flock Group Inc., UK-9287)

purchasing.uky.edu · 2026-09 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Lexington, KY · Active · Cameras: 15

University of Kentucky published vendor price-contract register: entry UK-9287 lists Flock Group Inc. for an 'ALPR System,' with a register expiration of November 8, 2028. This is a register entry, not the agreement: no amounts, camera counts, or execution dates are printed in it.

Authorizing instrument

Valley County Board of Commissioners minutes, April 28, 2026

valleycountyne.gov · 2026-04-28 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Ord, NE · Active · Cameras: 7

Valley County Board of Commissioners minutes, April 28, 2026: the board voted 3-0 to approve paying the Sheriff's Office invoice from the Flock camera grant (ARPA funds) and approved Flock camera placement on Highway 11 and Highway 22. The minutes are a funding authorization; no agreement text, term dates, or total amount are printed. The minutes file carries an April 14 header date from the prior meeting; the Flock items are in the April 28 minutes.

Authorizing instrument

Monongalia County Commission agenda, November 12, 2025

cms2.revize.com · 2025-11-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Morgantown, WV · Active · Cameras: 20

Monongalia County Commission agenda, November 12, 2025, item 9(e): 'Consideration to approve funding for Sheriff's LPR Program from the County Opioid Settlement Funds in the amount of $60,000 per year for three years.' The agenda does not name Flock or any vendor; the record's Flock connection is established by its other sources, including reporting of the Sheriff's Office's own statements about its Flock cameras. The agenda records the funding item as presented for consideration; it does not record a vote or an executed agreement.

Authorizing instrument

City of Racine Common Council adopted minutes, September 15, 2026 (item 0795-26)

cityofracine.legistar1.com · 2026-09-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Racine, WI · Active · Term: ? to 2026-12-31

City of Racine Common Council adopted minutes, September 15, 2026, item 0795-26. The Finance and Personnel Committee recommended maintaining the Flock contract through December 31, 2026. An amendment to terminate Flock within a 30-day grace period FAILED 6-8; an amendment to bag the cameras within 30 days and allow use of the data for ongoing investigations PASSED 8-7; the communication was approved as amended 8-6. The minutes record a decision to keep the contract in place through 2026, not a termination. They print no dollars or camera counts and are not the contract.

Authorizing instrument

City of Santa Cruz City Council adopted minutes, January 13, 2026 (item 28)

ecm.cityofsantacruz.com · 2026-01-13 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Santa Cruz, CA · Cancelled · Term: ? to 2026-02-12 · Cameras: 8

City of Santa Cruz adopted council minutes, January 13, 2026 (approved January 27, 2026), item 28: the council voted 6-1 to terminate the Flock Safety ALPR contract effective immediately and to cease using the ALPR system (AYES: Trigueiro, Newsome, Golder, O'Hara, Vice Mayor Kalantari-Johnson, Mayor Keeley; NOES: Brunner); a substitute motion to renew failed for lack of a second. The minutes print no camera count and no dollars. The meeting's agenda packet states the fully paid contract ends March 27, 2026 and allowed termination on 30 days' notice; the record's February 12, 2026 end date rests on that packet statement, not on the minutes.

Authorizing instrument

Town of Boonsboro Mayor and Council minutes, August 10, 2026

town.boonsboro.md.us · 2026-08-10 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Boonsboro, MD · Cancelled

Town of Boonsboro Mayor and Council minutes, August 10, 2026: a motion to approve changing LPR camera vendors from Flock to Axon carried (moved by Marilee Kerns, seconded by Ray Hanson; Mayor Howard Long absent, Assistant Mayor Tony Nally presiding). The minutes print no Flock termination date, amounts, or camera count.

Signed agreement

Services Agreement, Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Marion County (IMPD) / Flock Group Inc., executed January 27, 2025

indy.gov · 2025-01-27 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Indianapolis, IN · Active · Term: 2025-01-27 to 2028-12-31 · Cameras: 275

Executed services agreement between the Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County (IMPD) and Flock Group, Inc., signed 01/27/2025, term through 12/31/2028 (Sec 5.01). Sec 6.01 caps compensation at $6,000,000; that is a ceiling, not a stated spend. Attachment A: 275 Falcon cameras previously provided and installed, invoiced at $2,500/year. Attachment B also lists two Aerodome DFR 2.0 drone line items (Fixed Wing $466,000, Rotorcraft $388,000); those are drone hardware, not LPR cameras.

Signed agreement

Flock order form and Government Agency Customer Agreement, IA - Ankeny PD (public-records copy via ACLU of Iowa)

drive.google.com · 2022-07-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Ankeny, IA · Active · Term: 2022-07-06 to open · Annual cost: $35,000 · Cameras: 16

Executed Flock order form + Government Agency Customer Agreement for IA - Ankeny PD, signed July 5-6, 2022 (DocuSign). 13 Falcon cameras; Year 1 $38,250, recurring $35,000. The printed Initial Term was 24 months, so it expired on face around July 2024. The order form prints a 24-month auto-renewal clause (30-day non-renewal notice); no non-renewal is documented. Currency rests on that printed clause. Public-records copy obtained through the ACLU of Iowa's ALPR reporting and hosted on Google Drive.

Authorizing instrument

Harlan County Board of Supervisors minutes, January 7, 2025 (county 2025 minutes compilation)

harlancounty.ne.gov · 2025-01-07 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Alma, NE · Active

Adopted January 7, 2025 Harlan County (NE) Board of Supervisors minutes (approved January 14, 2025): motion carried 7-0 'to approve Sheriff Langley signing a contract with Flock for $15,000 to come out of Opioid Recovery fund.' The claims list shows 'OPIOID RECOVERY FUND: Flock Group LLC-Supplies $15,000.00.' No camera count, term, or renewal terms are printed in the minutes.

Authorizing instrument

Riley County Law Enforcement Agency Law Board Meeting

rileycountypolice.org · 2025-05-19 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Manhattan, KS · Active · Annual cost: $33,000 · Cameras: 11

Riley County Law Enforcement Agency Law Board budget packet, May 19, 2025 (pre-meeting packet; staff narrative, not adopted minutes): staff states '11 automated license plate readers (ALPRs) in partnership with Flock Safety' were installed, and lists 'Flock Safety / Annual Contract / $33,000.00' as a 2025 expenditure line (staff: 'approximately $3,000 per camera annually'). A staff request to allocate an additional $40,000 for expansion was not adopted in the packet. Not a signed agreement.

Authorizing instrument

Provo Police Department statement on Flock Safety contract (official city page)

provo.gov · undated · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Provo, UT · Active

City of Provo official newsflash (updated October 1, 2026): 'Provo City contracts with Flock Safety for Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras.' The page states Provo PD began using ALPR cameras in 2023. No term, camera count, dollars, or vote are printed; this is the city's statement, not the contract.

Authorizing instrument

Salisbury City Council adopted minutes, Legislative Session, December 15, 2025

salisburymd.granicus.com · 2025-12-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Salisbury, MD · Active

Salisbury City Council adopted minutes, Dec 15, 2025: 5-0 award of ITB A-26-114 (Police Safety System; motion Gregory, second Dashiell). The minutes print no vendor name, term, or amounts; the council packet for the same session, registered separately in this record's documents, names the vendor and the figures.

Authorizing instrument

Salisbury City Council agenda packet, December 15, 2025 (procurement memo and quote Q-172463)

d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net · 2025-12-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Salisbury, MD · Active

Salisbury City Council agenda packet, Dec 15, 2025: the procurement memo names Flock Safety Systems as vendor under the Texas DIR-CPO-5844 cooperative contract, cost $398,890.00 Year 1. The packet's attached quote Q-172463 (36-month term, 40 Falcon LPR + 40 Condor PTZ + 2 mobile trailers, Year 1 $398,890, recurring $354,090, total $1,107,070, 30-day retention, auto-renewal unless 30 days' non-renewal notice) is unsigned in the packet; those figures are the quote's terms, not executed-contract facts. No contract_start is derived: the quote ties the term to installation and validation.

Authorizing instrument

City of Florence (OR) council Final Action Minutes, February 2, 2026

ci.florence.or.us · 2026-02-02 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Florence, OR · Active · Cameras: 6

City of Florence OR council Final Action Minutes, Feb 2, 2026 (scanned PDF, read visually; no text layer): motion to cancel the Flock contract immediately failed 3-2; motion to continue the contract with Flock passed 3-2 (Carp, Webb, Ward Aye; Wantz, Beaudreau Nay). Police Chief Pitcher, recorded in the minutes: 'There are currently six cameras in place.' The minutes print no term, dollars, or vote beyond the two motions.

Authorizing instrument

Birmingham City Council minutes, December 16, 2025 (Resolution 2304-25)

bhamal.granicus.com · 2025-12-16 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Birmingham, AL · Active

Birmingham City Council Resolution 2304-25, adopted Dec 16, 2025 via consent (Ayes: Gunn, Smith, Smitherman, Williams, Woods, Tate, Alexander; Nays: None): authorizes the Mayor to enter into a Right of Way Encroachment License Agreement allowing Flock Safety to install 2 PTZ + 2 LPR cameras at four Rockford-neighborhood addresses. This is an encroachment license authorization, not the ALPR services contract; the resolution prints no term or dollars.

Authorizing instrument

Altoona Police Department ALPR program page (city website)

altoona-iowa.com · 2026 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Altoona, IA · Active · Term: 2024-05-08 to open · Cameras: 51

Official City of Altoona Police Department ALPR program page (not the contract): '2022 — Initial pilot: The Police Department began a pilot project with 10 Flock cameras, funded through asset forfeiture funds'; after the pilot, 'camera subscriptions were incorporated into the Police Department's operating budget'; '2024 — Flock expansion: The Flock deployment expanded to its current number of cameras' (no current count printed). The page also records the City Council's July 21, 2025 approval of an Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement (consent item 12(c), including Outpost ALPR units) and states: 'Altoona's contracts prohibit its ALPR providers from selling the Department's data.' The executed Flock agreement is not public; the circulating copy carries a blank signature block.

Authorizing instrument

GIPD Automatic License Plate Reader policy (effective 1/10/2024)

core-docs.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com · 2024-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Grand Island, NE · Active

Official Grand Island Police Department ALPR policy, General Order O2416 (Chief Kevin Denney, effective January 2024; not the contract; prints no term, count, or dollars): names Flock Safety as the department's ALPR vendor: 'ALPR vendor Flock Safety will store the data and ensure proper maintenance and security of data stored. Flock Safety will purge (hard delete) the data after (30) days.'

Authorizing instrument

Hall County Sheriff's Department ALPR policy (names Flock Safety as vendor, 30-day purge)

hallcountyne.gov · 2024-12 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Grand Island, NE · Active

Official Hall County Sheriff's Office ALPR policy, Standard Operating Procedure Section B-80 (not the contract; prints no term, count, or dollars): names Flock Safety as the department's ALPR vendor: 'ALPR vender, Flock Safety will store the data and ensure proper maintenance and security of data stored. Flock Safety will purge (hard delete) the data after 30 days.' ('vender' is the document's spelling.)

Signed agreement

Ottawa County Contract 2242 (Master Services Agreement and order form, Flock Safety)

boards.miottawa.org · 2024-03-26 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

MI · Active · Annual cost: $45,000 · Cameras: 31

Ottawa County (MI) Contract 2242: Master Services Agreement and Exhibit A order form with Flock Group Inc. The order form is executed by both parties (DocuSign: Mark Smith, Flock General Counsel, and Sheriff Steve Kempker, March 26, 2024): 15 Falcon cameras, Year 1 subtotal $54,950, annual recurring $45,000, contract total $99,950, 24-month initial and renewal terms, automatic renewal absent 30 days' non-renewal notice. The term runs from first installation and validation; no installation date is printed, so no contract_start is recorded. In this copy the MSA's own signature page carries county signatures only (Joe Moss, April 8, 2024; Justin F. Roebuck, April 2, 2024) and the vendor block is unsigned; Addendum 2341 recites the MSA as 'effective as of March 22, 2024,' a recital not reconciled with the April signature dates.

Signed agreement

Ottawa County Contract 2341 (Addendum No. 1, Holland Township passthrough)

boards.miottawa.org · 2024-06-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

MI · Active · Annual cost: $45,000 · Cameras: 31

Ottawa County (MI) Contract 2341, Addendum No. 1 to the Flock Master Services Agreement (county ratification June 4, 2024): Holland Township passthrough, 10 Falcon cameras, Year 1 $37,100, recurring $30,000, contract total $67,100, 24-month terms. Executed by the county and Flock (DocuSign). The 10 cameras are a Holland Township passthrough under the county agreement, not additional sheriff's-office cameras.

Signed agreement

Ottawa County Contract 2342 (Addendum No. 2, Park Township passthrough)

boards.miottawa.org · 2024-06-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

MI · Active · Annual cost: $45,000 · Cameras: 31

Ottawa County (MI) Contract 2342, Addendum No. 2 to the Flock Master Services Agreement (county ratification June 4, 2024): Park Township passthrough, 2 Falcon cameras, Year 1 $7,300, recurring $6,000, contract total $13,300, 24-month terms. Executed by the county and Flock (DocuSign). The 2 cameras are a Park Township passthrough under the county agreement, not additional sheriff's-office cameras.

Authorizing instrument

Ottawa County Contract 2377 (order form, Falcon Flex)

boards.miottawa.org · 2024-07-16 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

MI · Active · Annual cost: $45,000 · Cameras: 31

Ottawa County (MI) Contract 2377 order form (county ratification July 16, 2024): 2 Falcon Flex cameras, $14,000, 24-month terms. In this copy the Flock-side signature block is blank (names pre-printed, no signatures or dates); only the county execution page is signed (Joe Moss, July 26, 2024; Justin F. Roebuck, July 25, 2024). The form states it is effective 'when this Order Form is executed by both Parties.' Registered as an instrument, not an executed agreement: execution by both parties is not document-established.

Authorizing instrument

City of Jefferson City council packet, September 8, 2026 (amended; adopted minutes of August 17, 2026)

jeffersoncitymo.gov · 2026-09-08 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Jefferson City, MO · Active · Annual cost: $51,000 · Cameras: 17

City of Jefferson City council packet, September 8, 2026 (amended), carrying the adopted minutes of August 17, 2026: the council approved the Flock ALPR subscription renewal 9-1 (Nay: Holt). The packet's staff report states the renewal term May 15, 2026 through May 14, 2027, 17 license plate readers, $51,000; the packet includes invoice INV-99899 for that renewal and the Flock order form, which is marked a 'non-binding proposal for informational purposes only.' The figures are the staff report's and invoice's; the vote is the adopted minutes'.

Authorizing instrument

City of Beacon Resolution No. 2 of 2023 (Flock Group agreement authorization)

beaconny.gov · 2023 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Beacon, NY · Active

City of Beacon City Council Resolution No. 2 of 2023, 'Authorizing the City Administrator to Execute an Agreement with Flock Group, Inc. for License Plate Readers' (the resolution is numbered of 2023; its printed date reads 'January 17, 2022'; the inconsistency is the document's own): adopted, 'Motion Carried' (no tally printed). The resolution authorizes execution of the agreement and of extensions and amendments; it does not itself establish that an agreement was executed, and it prints no dollars, camera count, or term.

Authorizing instrument

City of South Portland News Flash: Flock ALPR Cameras Removed (posted July 1, 2026)

southportland.gov · 2026-07-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

South Portland, ME · Cancelled · Cameras: 7

City of South Portland News Flash, 'Flock ALPR Cameras Removed,' posted July 1, 2026: 'As a result of direction that the City Council provided at its June 11, 2026 workshop, the City of South Portland ceased its use of Flock automated license plate readers (ALPR) and stopped sharing data with other agencies effective immediately following the meeting. The City contacted Flock to remove the cameras, and as of June 22, 2026, Flock confirmed all cameras have been removed and there is no active South Portland account.' This is the city's official statement, not the contract.

Signed agreement

City of Eugene Software Services Contract No. 2025-03244 with Flock Group Inc. (executed; copy published by Eyes Off Eugene)

eyesoffeugene.org · 2025-03-24 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Eugene, OR · Cancelled · Term: 2025-03-24 to open · Annual cost: $171,000 · Cameras: 57

Executed City of Eugene Software Services Contract No. 2025-03244 with Flock Group Inc. (Flock Safety ALPR Software Services), signed by both parties: Sarah Medary, City Manager, 03/24/2025, and Mark Smith, Flock General Counsel, 3/20/2025 (DocuSign envelope D491964B-4BEC-49D9-A3CD-57C5D79BC314, printed on every page). Order form: 57 Flock Safety LPR (fka Falcon) cameras; Year 1 subtotal $171,000, annual recurring $171,000, contract total $342,000; Initial Term 24 months, Renewal Term 24 months; 30-day data retention. The city contract extends only by mutual agreement (up to three additional one-year terms, Sec 3.2); the order-form fine print also carries Flock's standard auto-renewal clause. Sec 26 sets the contract's effective date as the latest signature date (03/24/2025); the printed expiration is 'two years from date of first operational camera,' so no calendar end date is document-established. The contract names the City of Eugene as customer, not EPD specifically; the departmental link rests on the record's other sources. Copy published by the advocacy group Eyes Off Eugene (eyesoffeugene.org); no city-hosted public copy was located.

Authorizing instrument

Cookeville City Council adopted minutes, September 17, 2026

cookeville-tn.gov · 2026-09-17 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Cookeville, TN · Active · Term: 2026-06-08 to 2028-06-08 · Annual cost: $30,000 · Cameras: 10

Cookeville City Council adopted minutes, Sept 17, 2026 (4-0, Bagci absent): approved a two-year Flock Safety contract for 10 ALPRs, $30,000 per year, combining two existing 5-ALPR contracts (no new cameras added). The packet's order form prints term 6/8/2026-6/8/2028, Annual Recurring $30,000, Contract Total $60,000, and is unsigned by both parties in the packet copy; the minutes are the authorizing instrument.

Authorizing instrument

Liberty Hill City Council minutes, September 9, 2026 (published in the September 23, 2026 council packet)

swagit-attachments.granicus.com · 2026-09-09 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Liberty Hill, TX · Cancelled

Liberty Hill City Council adopted minutes, Sept 9, 2026 (published in the Sept 23 packet): motion to terminate the Flock Safety agreement, block its October renewal, and immediately remove all city-controlled cameras, carried 7-0. The minutes print no camera count, term, or dollars.

Authorizing instrument

Arlington County Board news release: County Board directs Manager to Discontinue use of Flock Technology

arlingtonva.us · 2026-09-15 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Arlington, VA · Cancelled · Cameras: 41

Arlington County Board official news release, Sept 15, 2026: the Board directed the County Manager to discontinue the use of county-leased Flock Safety technology (41 cameras: 26 Falcon LPR, 15 Condor PTZ) and begin removing all related equipment. The release asks for removal from public property within 14 business days 'though the process may extend beyond that timeframe as logistics require,' excludes private-property cameras, and directs deletion of data not needed for active investigations. No vote tally, contract dates, or dollars are printed.

Authorizing instrument

Henrico County news release: Henrico Police to eliminate Flock cameras

henrico.gov · 2026-10-06 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Henrico, VA · Cancelled

Henrico County official news release, Oct 6, 2026: the Henrico County Police Division 'is terminating its contract with Flock Safety' over privacy concerns and 'intends to cut ties with Flock Safety in the next seven days.' The release prints no effective date, vote, camera count, dollars, or contract dates; the termination is stated as in progress.

Authorizing instrument

Pflugerville City Council Final minutes, August 25, 2026 (Legistar matter 2026-0776)

legistar1.granicus.com · 2026-08-25 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Pflugerville, TX · Cancelled · Cameras: 28

Pflugerville City Council Final minutes, August 25, 2026 (Legistar matter 2026-0776, agenda item 6B): 'Mr. Coffman moved to defund and disable Flock cameras, and notify Flock that the city will not be renewing the contract. Mayor Pro Tem Holiday seconded the motion. All voted in favor. The motion carried.' No action approving the underlying $87,500/year Master Services Agreement with Flock Group Inc. was taken; the council adopted the non-renewal direction instead. Per the minutes, Flock cameras operated by school districts, private businesses, and HOAs are outside the city's action.

Authorizing instrument

North Branch City Council meeting packet, August 26, 2026 (CivicClerk)

northbranchmn.api.civicclerk.com · 2026-08-26 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

North Branch, MN · Cancelled · Cameras: 3

North Branch City Council meeting packet, August 26, 2026 (CivicClerk fileId 1379), agenda item 9a: 'Motion to refrain from the installation of Flock or any (ALPR's) cameras indefinitely and to remove and secure the three FLOCK cameras that had been installed.' Passed 5-0 (mover Ibinger, seconder Schieber). The packet's staff report states the council approved a three-year, seven-camera Flock contract on May 13, 2026 (3-2 vote, $63,000 total, funded by one-time 2023 State Public Safety Aid); three cameras were installed at Lincoln Trail & 360th Street, Forest Boulevard & 360th Street, and St. Croix Trail & 387th Street and were never activated; installation of the remaining four was paused.

Authorizing instrument

North Branch City Council meeting packet, September 9, 2026 (CivicClerk)

northbranchmn.api.civicclerk.com · 2026-09-09 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

North Branch, MN · Cancelled · Cameras: 3

North Branch City Council meeting packet, September 9, 2026 (CivicClerk fileId 1397), agenda item 9f: 'Motion to provide formal written notice to Flock Safety to terminate and cancel the current contract and not to renew.' Passed 5-0 (mover Goulet, seconder Ibinger). Counsel advised the agreement contains no termination-for-convenience provision and the city remains responsible for the financial obligations of the three-year term; the agreement's printed renewal clause requires 30 days' notice of non-renewal. The packet also records that the three installed cameras had been removed by Public Works staff.

Authorizing instrument

Briefing on Police Technology (City Council presentation, 2024-06-04) | City of Fort Worth

fortworthtexas.gov · 2024-06-04 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Fort Worth, TX · Active · Cameras: 250

Fort Worth Police Technology Update briefing presented to City Council on June 4, 2024 by Executive Assistant Chief Robert Alldredge (agenda attachment): states FWPD operates 'approximately 250' Flock cameras in the City of Fort Worth (a June 2024 snapshot) and that captured data is stored by Flock Safety and retained 30 days unless evidentiary. A briefing, not an authorization: it records no vote and states no Flock cost or contract term. The deck separately describes the city's in-house PTZ fleet (about 1,150 cameras, 63 with built-in LPR), which is distinct from the Flock fleet; its only dollar figure (about $1,200 per vehicle, Mobileye fleet collision prevention) is not a Flock figure.

Authorizing instrument

Kenner City Council agenda with results, December 1, 2022 (item 15-H, Ordinance 12,125)

kenner.la.us · 2022-12-01 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Kenner, LA · Active · Cameras: 55

Kenner City Council regular meeting, December 1, 2022, item 15-H: council carried 7/0 (motion Brennan, second Branigan) Summary Ordinance No. 13,111 (the proposed number), enacted as Ordinance No. 12,125, authorizing a two-year agreement for a fifty-five (55) camera license plate recognition system from Flock Safety, a sole source provider, in the amount of $294,250.00 for the Kenner Police Department, including site and safety assessment, camera setup, testing, and freight. This is the annotated agenda-with-results; no separate minutes document is posted for this meeting. The $294,250 is the two-year total; no annual figure is stated or derived.

Authorizing instrument

Woodland City Council adopted minutes, February 3, 2026 (Resolution 8609)

woodlandca.api.civicclerk.com · 2026-02-03 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Woodland, CA · Active · Term: 2026-02-03 to 2028-02-03 · Annual cost: $148,000 · Cameras: 38

Woodland City Council Regular Meeting Minutes, February 3, 2026: on a 5-0 vote (motion Vega, second Lansburgh), the council adopted Resolution No. 8609 authorizing the City Manager to enter a 2-year contract with Flock Group, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $300,000. Item H.6 had been pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. The staff report (packet) states the contract co-terms the department's existing Flock agreements into one, that four cannabis dispensaries reimburse $80,000/year toward it, and that the city's direct cost is about $140,000; the packet's unsigned order form prints $148,000 annual recurring and a $296,000 two-year total. No camera count is stated in either document, and no calendar term dates are printed.

Authorizing instrument

Spokane County Resolution 22-0534 (Flock Safety franchise)

spokanecowa.api.civicclerk.com · 2022-08-09 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Spokane County, WA · Active · Cameras: 46

Spokane County Board resolution granting Flock Safety a telecommunications franchise for county rights-of-way, adopted August 9, 2022 (packet copy, pre-execution text; adoption confirmed in the county Resolution Directory). A franchise for road right-of-way use, not a camera purchase: no camera count or cost is stated. Section 3 of the packet copy names 'Avista' in error (a scrivener's error corrected by Res 25-0264). The printed twenty-five-year term was amended to five years by Res 25-0264, so the operative term runs about August 2022 to about August 2027.

Authorizing instrument

Spokane County Resolution 25-0264 (franchise amendment)

spokanecowa.api.civicclerk.com · 2025-05-20 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Spokane County, WA · Active · Cameras: 46

Spokane County Board resolution amending the Flock Safety franchise (Res 22-0534), adopted May 20, 2025 (vote 4 yes, 1 absent): adds discrete ALPR site blocks (for example Appleway Ave and Wellesley Ave), corrects scrivener's errors (franchise term 'twenty-five (25) years' to 'five (5) years'; 'Avista' to 'Flock Safety'), and adds Section 8.1 utility-pole language. The signed copy includes Flock Safety's acceptance (General Counsel Mark Smith, notarized January 10, 2025), which predates the board's adoption. This is the signed, adopted copy.

Authorizing instrument

Spokane County Resolution 2023-0215 (sole-source award)

spokanecowa.api.civicclerk.com · 2023-03-28 · Record accurate as of 2026-10-19

Spokane County, WA · Active · Cameras: 46

Spokane County Board resolution declaring Flock Safety the sole source for Flock Safety hardware and software, adopted March 28, 2023 (packet copy, pre-adoption text; adoption confirmed in the county Resolution Directory). The sole-source declaration form (a separate attachment) states Estimated Total Cost $205,750.00 and a project window of 01/01/2023 to 12/31/2026. The resolution itself states: 'This award does not constitute a contract.' The county directory index prints Project No. P13389; the attached documents print PROJECT NO. P13407; both are carried here as printed.

Petitions

Citizen petitions created to counter Flock Safety deployments: residents asking their city or agency to remove the cameras, ban them, defund them, or let the contract lapse. A petition is listed here only because a reviewer opened the petition page and recorded what it said. Petitions are citizen speech, not evidence about a contract, and listing one is not an endorsement.

Signature counts are snapshots. Each card shows the count a reviewer read on the petition page and the date it was read. Counts keep moving after that date; follow the link for the live number.

Loading…

Collecting signatures

Remove Flock AI Cameras from the Cape Fear Region

Change.org · Cape Fear Region, NC

To: County commissions of New Hanover, Onslow, Pender, and Columbus counties and the Town of Carolina Beach · 4,207 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Mark Williams · Started 2026-02-24

Asks officials across the Cape Fear region to remove Flock AI cameras; a multi-county campaign with no single tracker record.

Collecting signatures

Stop Funding mass surveillance: Defund Flock Cameras in Henderson County, NC

Change.org · Henderson County, NC

To: Henderson County Board of Commissioners and Henderson County Manager · 2,886 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Austin Rhodes · Started 2026-08-06

Asks the Henderson County commissioners and county manager to stop funding Flock cameras; addressed to the funders of the sheriff deployment the tracker records.

Collecting signatures

Ban Flock Surveillance Cameras in Wisconsin

Change.org · Statewide: Wisconsin

To: Wisconsin lawmakers · 2,706 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Community Petition · Started 2026-07-27

Asks Wisconsin lawmakers to ban Flock cameras and other warrantless automated surveillance. The largest petition on this page by signatures read.

Collecting signatures

DeflockLoveland, Removing Flock Cameras in Loveland Colorado

Change.org · Loveland, CO

To: Loveland City Council · 1,342 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Gabe Sayer · Started 2026-07-10

Asks Loveland to remove its Flock cameras; the petition cites at least 65 cameras installed in the city.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Auburn, CA!

Change.org · Auburn, CA

To: Auburn City Council and Auburn Police Department · 1,230 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Kurtis Ostrom · Started 2026-08-06

Petitions the Auburn, California City Council and Police Department to end Flock camera use. Not Auburn, New York.

Collecting signatures

Cancel the Flock Contract in Avondale Estates, GA

Change.org · Avondale Estates, GA

To: City of Avondale Estates · 986 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Gregory Hendler · Started 2026-08-31

Demands immediate cancellation of Avondale Estates' Flock contract (10 cameras, per the petition) and a commitment against future Flock or competitor surveillance contracts.

Collecting signatures

Request for Removal and Termination of Flock Safety Automated License Plate Readers

Change.org · Cambridge, OH

To: Cambridge City Council · 890 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Trinity Milliken · Started 2026-08-26

Petitions the Cambridge, Ohio City Council to terminate the city use of Flock Safety ALPR cameras and remove all Flock equipment in the city. Not Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Collecting signatures

Petition to Remove Flock Cameras from Dare County, NC

Change.org · Dare County, NC

To: Dare County and its participating municipalities · 828 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Andrea O'Donnell · Started 2026-07-11

Asks Dare County and its municipalities to remove Flock Safety cameras and decline renewal of any current Flock contracts. The tracker record for the Dare County Sheriff is marked cancelled; the petition describes cameras operating in the county.

Collecting signatures

End Flock & ALPR Mass Surveillance in North Carolina

Change.org · Statewide: North Carolina

To: North Carolina General Assembly and Governor of North Carolina · 818 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Mark Williams · Started 2026-09-12

Asks North Carolina to end Flock and ALPR mass surveillance statewide.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Roseville, CA

Change.org · Roseville, CA

To: Roseville City Council and Roseville Police Department · 758 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Kurtis Ostrom · Started 2026-08-06

Asks the Roseville City Council and Police Department to end Flock camera use.

Collecting signatures

REMOVE AND BAN ALL ALPR CAMERAS IN DAVIE COUNTY, NC

Change.org · Davie County, NC

To: Davie County Sheriff and Davie County Board of Commissioners · 583 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Jeff Plott · Started 2026-10-13

Demands removal of all ALPR cameras, termination of Flock and other ALPR contracts, and a countywide ban.

Collecting signatures

Ban and remove Flock cameras in Lancaster County, South Carolina

Change.org · Lancaster County, SC

To: Lancaster County Council · 561 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Timothy Phillips · Started 2026-07-23

Asks Lancaster County Council to ban and remove Flock cameras in Lancaster County, South Carolina.

Collecting signatures

Petition to Remove All Automated Vehicle Surveillance Systems from Mount Pleasant, SC

Change.org · Mount Pleasant, SC

To: Mount Pleasant Town Council · 467 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Scott Roslund · Started 2026-07-02

Demands the Town Council immediately remove all automated license plate reader cameras, including Flock Safety systems and Axon Lightpost.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock PDX: Stop ALPR Surveillance in Portland, Oregon

Change.org · Portland, OR

To: Portland City Council, Mayor, and Portland Police Bureau · 435 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Denise Slattery · Started 2026-08-15

Calls on Portland City Council, the Mayor, and the Police Bureau to stop ALPR surveillance in Portland, Oregon.

Collecting signatures

Protect Our Privacy: Remove Flock Surveillance Cameras from Rutherford County

openPetition · Rutherford County, NC

To: Rutherford County Commissioners and local authorities · 399 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Started 2026-08-11

Calls on Rutherford County to remove existing Flock cameras and halt expansion or funding. The platform does not display a public organizer name.

Collecting signatures

Remove Flock cameras in Garden City, Michigan

Change.org · Garden City, MI

To: Garden City City Council · 387 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Rich Stoddard · Started 2026-09-28

Asks Garden City not to renew any Flock contract and to remove the existing cameras, citing Westland and Eastpointe cancellations.

Collecting signatures

Get the FLOCK Out of Ottawa County

Change.org · Ottawa County, MI

To: Holland Township and Ottawa County leaders · 371 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Tasha Corrigan · Started 2026-06-24

A separate Ottawa County campaign from the De-Flock petition above: asks Holland Township leaders for a public conversation before expansion and to reconsider the AI surveillance cameras.

Declared victory

Hewitt TX Residents: Remove Flock Safety and all ALPR Cameras

Change.org · Hewitt, TX

To: Hewitt City Council · 357 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: RJ Pase · Started 2026-08-26

Asks Hewitt to terminate its Flock Safety program, remove the cameras (about 20, per the petition), and prohibit future ALPR use. The petition page declared victory on 2026-10-01, quoting city officials that the cameras are deactivated and set to be removed.

Collecting signatures

Cancel Houston’s Flock Safety Contract!

Change.org · Houston, TX

To: Houston City Council, Houston Police Department, and the City of Houston · 348 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Austin Pendergraft · Started 2026-08-18

Calls on Houston to reject ALPR networks including Flock, and to require public disclosure, an independent privacy audit, and community approval before deployment or renewal.

Collecting signatures

Flock Off Shasta County - Ban Flock Safety cameras in Shasta County, CA

Change.org · Shasta County, CA

To: Anderson City Council and Shasta County leaders · 342 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Christina Smith · Started 2026-08-19

Asks Anderson and Shasta County to terminate Flock contracts, remove the cameras, and delete stored data; signatures are to be delivered at a council meeting.

Collecting signatures

Ban Flock Safety License Plate Reader Cameras in Horry County, SC

Change.org · Horry County, SC

To: Horry County Council · 272 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Charles Hooks · Started 2026-08-27

Asks Horry County to end its use of Flock automated license plate readers.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Sylacauga

Change.org · Sylacauga, AL

To: Sylacauga City Council · 237 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Cory Holcomb · Started 2026-09-06

Asks Sylacauga to end the use of Flock Safety cameras in the city.

Collecting signatures

Ban Flock and Other AI License Plate Cameras in Oregon

Change.org · Statewide: Oregon

To: Oregon State Legislature · 220 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Community Petition · Started 2026-10-08

Asks the Oregon Legislature to pass the statewide ALPR ban bill the petition says Reps. Chotzen and Skarlatos plan to introduce.

Collecting signatures

Ban Flock & All ALPRs in Franklin County, KY

Change.org · Franklin County, KY

To: Franklin County Sheriff and Franklin County governing bodies · 212 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Madeleine Hay · Started 2026-10-02

Implores Sheriff Dwayne Depp to terminate his Flock Safety contract and all Franklin County governing bodies to ban ALPRs and AI mass surveillance.

Collecting signatures

Get the Flock Out of Bellevue, KY

Change.org · Bellevue, KY

To: City of Bellevue · 185 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Heather Bailey · Started 2026-09-16

Demands immediate cancellation of Bellevue's Flock contract and permanent removal of the cameras; rejects a pause or suspension.

Collecting signatures

Take action and protect our community from mass surveillance!

Action Network · Santa Barbara, CA

To: Santa Barbara City Council · 164 signatures (as of 2026-10-19)

The DeFlock 805 petition: asks Santa Barbara not to renew Flock, not to contract another ALPR vendor, and to require audits and data protections.

Collecting signatures

Flock Out of Quincy

Action Network · Quincy, MA

To: Quincy City Council · 137 signatures (as of 2026-10-19)

Asks Quincy, Massachusetts to dissolve its Flock contract (60+ cameras, per the page) and adopt a CCOPS-style oversight ordinance. The page's printed petition title is “Sign the Petition!”. Not Quincy, Illinois, which the tracker also covers.

Collecting signatures

Ban ALPRs and Indiscriminate Mass Surveillance in Abilene and Taylor County

Action Network · Abilene and Taylor County, TX

To: Abilene City Council, Taylor County Commissioners Court, Abilene Police Department · 120 signatures (as of 2026-10-19)

An independent DeFlock Abilene advocacy petition asking Abilene and Taylor County to ban ALPRs and indiscriminate mass surveillance.

Collecting signatures

Terminate the contract with Flock to protect privacy rights

Change.org · Livonia, MI

To: Livonia City Council · 114 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Richie Par · Started 2026-10-06

Asks Livonia to terminate its contract with Flock to protect privacy rights, citing the installation of Flock Safety cameras across the city.

Collecting signatures

Tell Congress to defund Flock's totalitarian camera network!

MoveOn · National

To: U.S. Congress · 44 signatures (as of 2026-10-18)

Urges Congress to pass legislation withholding federal funding from police departments and municipalities that use Flock or other ALPR cameras.

Collecting signatures

Remove Bakersfield's Flock Cameras and Reject Any Expansion

Change.org · Bakersfield, CA

To: Bakersfield City Council · 42 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Lucas Choate · Started 2026-10-16

Asks the Bakersfield City Council to remove the existing Flock cameras and reject any extension of the system.

Collecting signatures

De-Flock Florida: Expand the Highway Ban Statewide

Change.org · Statewide: Florida

To: Florida State Legislature · 41 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Garrett culpepper · Started 2026-09-01

Petitions the Florida Legislature to expand the state highway Flock ban statewide.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Orange County California

Action Network · Orange County, CA

To: All Orange County City Council Members and County Supervisors · 37 signatures (as of 2026-10-19)

Asks Orange County city councils and the Board of Supervisors to end Flock camera use across the county.

Collecting signatures

Stop the Flock: Demand Transparency for License Plate Surveillance Cameras

MoveOn · National

To: City councils and U.S. Congress · 33 signatures (as of 2026-10-18)

Asks for public disclosure of ALPR contract terms and false-positive rates, independent audits, and a warrant requirement for government purchase of location data. Explicitly does not ask for a ban.

Collecting signatures

Demand a public vote on Flock cameras in Pickens County, SC

Change.org · Pickens County, SC

To: Pickens County Sheriff Tommy Blankenship · 26 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Ashley Talley · Started 2026-08-06

Demands a public vote on Flock cameras in Pickens County, whose installation the petition says was initiated solely by Sheriff Blankenship.

Collecting signatures

Ban Flock cameras in Western North Carolina

Change.org · Western North Carolina

To: Western North Carolina local governments · 13 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Lila Herman · Started 2026-10-01

Demands removal of Flock cameras from schools and public spaces across Western North Carolina.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Utah!

MoveOn · Statewide: Utah

To: Utah Legislature, the Governor, county governments, and municipal leaders · 10 signatures (as of 2026-10-18)

Calls on Utah leaders to prohibit installation and use of Flock ALPR systems statewide, with judicial oversight and retention limits.

Collecting signatures

Remove flock cameras from Denver

Change.org · Denver, CO

To: City of Denver · 6 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Sabrina Popken · Started 2026-10-03

Urges Denver to halt Flock camera use and convene a public forum on their future. The tracker record for Denver PD is already marked cancelled.

Collecting signatures

DeFlock Indiana

Change.org · Statewide: Indiana

To: Governor of Indiana, Indiana General Assembly, and Indiana local governments · 2 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Kyle Alexander · Started 2026-08-14

Petitions for the removal and permanent prohibition of all ALPR cameras throughout Indiana, naming Flock Safety, Axon, and Vigilant systems.

Collecting signatures

Demand a Public Review and Vote on Flock Cameras in Paducah

Change.org · Paducah, KY

To: Paducah Board of Commissioners and City of Paducah · 2 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Zac Underwood · Started 2026-09-20

Asks Paducah for a public review of its Flock program and a public vote on whether it continues, with removal or non-renewal as an available outcome.

Collecting signatures

De-Flock Ottawa County

Change.org · Ottawa County, MI

To: Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Ottawa County Sheriff's Office · 1 signatures (as of 2026-10-19) · Organizer: Tyler Duggins · Started 2026-09-20

Asks Ottawa County to remove all Flock cameras, not renew or extend the agreement, and permanently delete stored Flock data.

Collecting signatures

Block Flock and Protect Americans' Privacy and Data!

MoveOn · National

To: State and city elected officials nationwide

Asks state and city officials nationwide to cut or refuse contracts with Flock Safety and similar ALPR vendors, limit data retention and sharing. The page shows milestone updates only (1,000 signatures reached 2026-08-26), not a live count.

Collecting signatures

Congress: Defund Flock Surveillance

The Other 98% · National

To: U.S. Congress · Organizer: The Other 98%

Asks Congress to strip federal funding from departments running mass license plate surveillance. Goal shown on the page: 25,000 signatures; the current count is not displayed.

Collecting signatures

#GetFlocked - Ban Mass License-Plate Surveillance in Utah

One Mob Clothing Co. · Statewide: Utah

To: Governor of Utah, Utah State Legislature, Utah Privacy Governing Board, UDOT, and Utah city and county governments · Organizer: One Mob Clothing Co.

A civic initiative petition asking Utah to ban mass ALPR surveillance, revoke UDOT camera permits, and decline contract renewals. The page does not display a signature count; signatures are delivered to the signer's own state legislators.

Learn

How cancellations happen

Some contracts print renewal terms, and a renewal vote is a high-leverage moment: the agency must publicly defend the system. Documented renewal dates are rare in this dataset; where a contract prints one, the tracker's Renewal / decision column shows it.
What has worked elsewhere: public-records requests for the contract and audit logs, packing the council meeting, and citing neighboring towns that already cancelled.
23+ jurisdictions cancelled or rejected Flock systems in 2026; roughly 98 have done so since 2021 (DeFlock tally via press reporting). The playbook is proven.

Spotting the cameras

Flock Falcon (ALPR): small bullet camera on a pole, usually with a solar panel and a boxy housing. Photographs every passing plate.
Flock Raven: audio gunshot-detection sensor, often co-located with Falcons.
Flock Condor: pan-tilt-zoom live video camera for intersections and lots.

Contribute

Contract tip (new deal, renewal date, cancellation vote)? Open an issue with a source link.
Camera sightings go to DeFlock; they flow into OpenStreetMap.
Check Have I Been Flocked to see if your plate appears in released audit logs.

Case studies: how records get corrected

Racine, Wisconsin (minutes beat headlines). News coverage of an August 2026 council fight left this record reading "cancelled." The clerk-attested adopted minutes of September 15, 2026 showed the termination amendment actually failed 6-8 and the contract runs through December 31, 2026. The record was corrected to active, and the minutes are registered in the Contracts tab. Lesson: vote outcomes come from minutes, not from reporting about votes.
Monongalia County, West Virginia (split provenance). The county commission agenda documents the money precisely: $60,000 per year for three years for the Sheriff's license plate reader program. The agenda never names a vendor; the Flock connection rests on the Sheriff's Office's own statements in other sources. The tracker keeps those two facts labeled separately instead of letting a document appear to prove more than it says.
Eugene, Oregon (the contract itself). An executed copy of the city's 2025 Flock agreement, published by a local advocacy group after the city's December 2025 termination, settled fields that reporting had left conflicting: 57 cameras, $171,000 annual recurring, effective March 24, 2025. It still does not print a calendar end date, so that field stays empty. Lesson: a real contract answers many questions, and the honest record keeps the ones it does not answer blank.

Safety and scope

Flock-Off is for awareness and lawful civic action: mapping, records requests, public pressure, contract fights.
Do not touch, disable, or vandalize cameras. That carries criminal liability and shifts the debate from privacy policy to property damage.
Violence is never acceptable, under any circumstances. See the Legal tab for our full position and the verbatim laws behind it.

Privacy

No account, no cookies, no analytics, no fingerprinting. The site sets nothing in your browser and runs no third-party trackers.
Contract tips go through GitHub issues. What you write in an issue is public and attributed to your GitHub account, so submit only public information. The site's own submission endpoint is key-holder-only for the operator pipeline; there is no anonymous public submission form.
No third parties while you read. The site loads no third-party scripts, styles, images, or data: your browser talks only to the site's own origin until you click a link. Source citations and tool-directory links leave the site under their own sites' policies.
Hosting. The site runs on Vercel, which keeps standard server request logs (IP, page, time) to operate the service; that cannot be switched off. Nothing is added on top: our code keeps no visitor logs, and the report endpoint uses your IP only in memory for rate limiting, never writing it to storage.

Legal

Violence is never acceptable

Flock-Off is a transparency project. We document public contracts between police agencies and Flock Safety so communities can debate them, file records requests, pack council meetings, and vote. That is the entire playbook.

Violence is not acceptable under any circumstances. Not against people, not against cameras, not against property, not as retaliation, not as protest. Specifically:

Do not damage, disable, deface, steal, or tamper with cameras or any related equipment.
Do not threaten, harass, stalk, or dox any person, including Flock Safety employees, police officers, elected officials, or private citizens.
Do not use information on this site to facilitate any of the above.

Anyone who commits violence or vandalism in the name of this cause is acting against this project, not for it. We will not defend it, excuse it, or characterize it as activism. Change the contract, not the hardware.

The law that protects this publication

Publishing truthful information about government contracts and matters of public concern is protected speech. Six authorities, quoted verbatim:

1. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Source: National Archives transcription of the Bill of Rights, archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript

2. New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 714 (1971) (per curiam)

The Supreme Court refused to block publication of the Pentagon Papers, holding:

"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity."

Source: opinion text, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713

3. Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)

The Court held the First Amendment protects publishing truthful information about a matter of public concern:

"Parallel reasoning requires the conclusion that a stranger's illegal conduct does not suffice to remove the First Amendment shield from speech about a matter of public concern."

Source: opinion syllabus, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/532/514

4. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 495 (1975)

The Court held that states may not punish the publication of truthful information contained in official records open to public inspection:

"the States may not impose sanctions on the publication of truthful information contained in official court records open to public inspection."

Sources: opinion text, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/420/469 and supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/420/469

5. The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524, 524-525 (1989)

The Court held that truthful, lawfully obtained information about a matter of public significance cannot be punished absent a state interest of the highest order:

"if a newspaper lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance then state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order."

Sources: official U.S. Reports PDF, govinfo.gov and law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/491/524

6. Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co., 443 U.S. 97, 102 (1979)

The Court stated the core rule later called the "Daily Mail principle":

"Our recent decisions demonstrate that state action to punish the publication of truthful information seldom can satisfy constitutional standards."

Sources: supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/443/97 and caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/443/97

These protections cover the publication of truthful, lawfully obtained information. They do not create a right to obtain government records in the first place, and each case was decided on its own facts rather than as blanket immunity. Flock-Off stays inside these holdings by publishing only information gathered lawfully: public records requests, open meetings, and published documents. No hacking, no evasion of access controls.

When courts have ordered takedowns, and why those cases are different

The protection for publishing truthful information is strong, but it is not absolute. Courts have ordered published material removed in narrow circumstances. Each of those cases turned on something this project does not do:

7. United States v. Progressive, Inc., 467 F. Supp. 990, 996 (W.D. Wis. 1979)

A federal court enjoined a magazine from publishing technical details of hydrogen bomb design, holding the article fell "within the extremely narrow exception to the rule against prior restraint." The restraint rested on the Atomic Energy Act's criminal prohibition on disclosing nuclear "Restricted Data" found to pose grave, direct, immediate, and irreparable harm to the United States. Why it is different: no federal statute prohibits publishing public-records information about police contracts, and no court has found such publication a national-security harm.

Source: opinion text, law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/467/990/1376343

8. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429, 435 (2d Cir. 2001)

The Second Circuit affirmed a permanent injunction barring the posting of, and knowingly linking to, the DeCSS DVD-decryption program under the DMCA's anti-trafficking provisions:

"The injunction primarily bars the Appellants from posting DeCSS on their web site and from knowingly linking their web site to any other web site on which DeCSS is posted. We affirm."

Why it is different: the injunction targeted distribution of a functional circumvention tool built to defeat copyright protection, not the republication of truthful facts drawn from public records.

Source: opinion text, law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/273/429/506315

9. DVD Copy Control Assn. v. Bunner, 31 Cal. 4th 864, 884 (2003)

A trial court ordered a website operator to remove posted DeCSS code on trade-secret grounds. The California Supreme Court held that such an injunction, when proper under trade-secret law, is no First Amendment violation:

"Because the injunction is content neutral and was issued because of Bunner's prior unlawful conduct, we conclude it is not a prior restraint and therefore does not violate the First Amendment."

The full story matters: on remand the injunction was reversed for failure of proof under trade-secret law, so the removal order did not ultimately stand. Why it is different: the entire theory was misappropriation of proprietary trade secrets the defendant knew were improperly acquired. Information drawn from public government records cannot be anyone's trade secret.

Source: filed opinion PDF, techlawjournal.com/courts2003/dvdcca_bunner/20030825.pdf

10. Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 545 (1985)

This is the canonical case where a publisher lost, stated precisely: the relief was damages ($12,500), not a takedown order. The Nation published 300 to 400 words of verbatim excerpts from President Ford's unpublished memoir to scoop a licensed serialization, and the Court held the magazine "effectively arrogated to itself the right of first publication, an important marketable subsidiary right." Why it is different: the case was about verbatim copying of unpublished copyrighted expression. Facts are not copyrightable, and a tracker republishing facts from public records asserts no right of first publication.

Source: opinion text, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/471/539

Flock Safety vs. DeFlock: the closest real-world test

DeFlock is a crowdsourced map of ALPR cameras. On January 30, 2025, Flock Safety's outside counsel sent its creator a cease-and-desist letter. The letter did not allege hacking, trespass, or terms-of-service violations, and it did not challenge the mapping itself. It asserted trademark dilution by blurring and tarnishment (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)) and false advertising (Lanham Act § 43(a)), demanding the creator stop using the name "DeFlock." Notably, the letter itself conceded the key point:

"While Flock does not object to the free dissemination of truthful information, your use of the Flock Marks as part of your brand DEFLOCK is being wrongfully used to make false statements about Flock and its products and is damaging both its reputation and the goodwill associated with the Flock Marks."

On February 14, 2025, the Electronic Frontier Foundation responded on the creator's behalf:

"The claims alleged in your letter are groundless, and Mr. Freeman will not be complying with your demands."

The EFF's grounds: federal anti-dilution law expressly carves out noncommercial use and criticism or commentary on the mark owner (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)); dilution requires a "famous," household-name mark; and false-advertising law applies only to "commercial advertising or promotion," which a noncommercial camera map is not.

The outcome, stated precisely: DeFlock was not vindicated by a court order; after the EFF's rebuttal, no lawsuit followed and the site stayed up. And the dispute was about the project's name and branding, never about the lawfulness of publishing camera locations.

Sources: cease-and-desist letter, eff.org (PDF); EFF response letter, eff.org (PDF); reporting by 404 Media, 404media.co

The law that prohibits violence, vandalism, and threats

1. Destruction of government property: 18 U.S.C. § 1361

Whoever willfully injures or commits any depredation against any property of the United States, or of any department or agency thereof, or any property which has been or is being manufactured or constructed for the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or attempts to commit any of the foregoing offenses, shall be punished as follows: If the damage or attempted damage to such property exceeds the sum of $1,000, by a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both; if the damage or attempted damage to such property does not exceed the sum of $1,000, by a fine under this title or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Source: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1361

Note: most Flock cameras are owned by Flock Safety or by state and local agencies rather than the federal government, so this specific statute may not cover a given camera. Every state separately criminalizes vandalism and destruction of property under its own criminal mischief, malicious destruction, or vandalism statutes. Whatever a given camera's ownership, damaging it is a crime under the applicable state law.

2. Threats transmitted online: 18 U.S.C. § 875(c)

Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Source: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/875

Federal courts have treated internet transmissions as satisfying the interstate-commerce element in section 875(c) prosecutions. Whether any given message violates the statute depends on its content and context, but posting threats online in connection with this cause can be a federal crime.

Disclaimers

This page is informational, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it.
Flock-Off is an independent community research project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Flock Safety, Inc. or any law enforcement agency.
Contract data is community-researched from public sources. We work for accuracy, but records change and mistakes happen; verify before acting on any entry. See the methodology.
Statute and opinion texts are transcribed verbatim from the sources cited. Laws change; consult the cited sources for current text.